常规雾化吸入和电动雾化泵雾化吸入对小儿哮喘的治疗效果分析

Effect evaluation of conventional atomizing inhalation and electric atomizing pump atomizing inhalation in the treatment of children with asthma

目的评价不同雾化吸入方法治疗小儿哮喘的效果。方法选择我院在2013年8月至2016年1月收治的110例小儿哮喘患儿作为研究对象,将所有患儿按照随机方法分为观察组和对照组,每组55例。对照组患儿以常规的雾化吸入方法进行治疗,观察组患儿采用氧驱动雾化方式进行治疗,对两组患儿的治疗效果进行比较。结果观察组患儿的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患儿PaO_2和FVC比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患儿PaO_2和FVC均有改善,且观察组改善更为明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿不良反应发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对小儿哮喘采用氧驱动雾化方式进行治疗,能够有效提高患儿治疗的总有效率,值得在临床上推广使用。

Objective To evaluate the effect of different atomizing inhalation methods in the treatment of infantile asthma.Methods One hundred and ten cases of children with asthma in our hospital from August 2013 to January 2016 were selected as the study subjects, and they were divided into observation group and control group according to the random method, with 55 cases in each group. The control group received conventional atomizing inhalation, and the observation group received the oxygen-driven atomization, then the effects of the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Before treatment, the PaO_2 and FVC in the two groups were not significantly different（P〉0.05）; after treatment, PaO_2 and FVC improved in the two groups, but the improvement was more obvious in the observation group,the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. The incidence rate of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The use of oxygen-driven atomization in children with asthma for atomization treatment can effectively improve the efficiency of treatment, which is worth of promotion in clinic.