期刊文献+

群体内疚:界定、心理机制、行动倾向及干预策略 被引量:6

Collective guilt:Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency and interventions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当个体认为内群体为外群体受到的不道德伤害负有责任时会体验到群体内疚。该情绪常见的触发情境包括过往历史的伤害事件、当下的群际冲突、不公正的社会关系及未来的伤害事件。群体认同、内群体责任和不当性评估是影响群体内疚产生的三大心理机制。群体内疚会导致施害群体对受害群体表现出积极行动,如友善态度,冲突和解、群体补偿及群际支持。通过群体肯定、自我肯定、促进共同认同、强调内群体责任及展现已有补偿行为等干预策略可以引发施害群体的群体内疚。未来的研究应澄清群体内疚的成因机制,进一步探索群体内疚与补偿行为间的作用关系。 When an important ingroup is considered responsible for immorality harm toward outgroup, individuals can experience collective guilt. This kind of emotion can result from past harmful events, current intergroup conflicts, unfair social relations and future harmful events. Group identity, ingroup responsibility and behavior illegitimacy are three key antecedents of collective guilt. Collective guilt could cause members of perpetrator group to perform positive behaviors toward the victimized group, such as friendly attitudes, reconciliations, compensations and intergroup supports. Methods for inducing collective guilt include group affirmation, self affirmation, promoting common identity, highlighting ingroup responsibility, showing existing compensation actions and so on. Future research should clarify genetic mechanism of collective guilt and further explore the complex relationship between collective guilt and reparation.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期1058-1068,共11页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 山东省社会科学规划项目(16DJYJ04) 全国教育科学规划项目(DIA150304)资助
关键词 群体内疚 群体认同 群体肯定 群体情绪 collective guilt group identity group affirmation group-based emotions
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献168

  • 1施承孙,钱铭怡.羞耻和内疚的差异[J].心理科学进展,1999,9(1):35-38. 被引量:48
  • 2周详,杨治良,郝雁丽.理性学习的局限:道德情绪理论对道德养成的启示[J].道德与文明,2007(3):57-60. 被引量:40
  • 3Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994).Guilt: An .interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
  • 4Berndsen, M, & McGarty, C. (2010).The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 500-513.
  • 5Bransnmbe, N. R., & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup's negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In L.Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Brown, R., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669-684.
  • 7Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Zagefka, H., Manzi, J., & Cehajic, S. (2008). Nuestra Culpa: Collective guilt as a predictor for reparation for historical wrong-doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75-90.
  • 8Doosje, B. & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Attributions for the negative historical actions of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 235-248.
  • 9Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-876.
  • 10Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effect of ingroup identification. Group processes and intergroup relations, 9, 325-338.

共引文献57

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部