期刊文献+

无创正压通气治疗重症支气管哮喘的护理效果与措施分析 被引量:3

Care effect analysis of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation measures in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的剖析无创正压通气治疗重症支气管哮喘的护理方法与效果。方法选取该院2014年8月至2016年3月收治的重症支气管哮喘患者64例。以电脑随机盲法为原理分为研究组和对照组,每组32例。两组均予以无创正压通气治疗以及常规护理,研究组同时加用综合护理干预法。观察两组病情变化,比较恢复周期。结果研究组患者恢复周期明显短于对照组,总有效率明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈O.05)。结论于重症支气管哮喘无创正压通气治疗中合理加用综合护理干预措施,可促进患者病情的改善,缩短恢复周期。 Objective To analyze the effect of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation nursing method in the treatment of severe bronchial asthma. Methods 64 cases of severe bronchial asthma patients treated in our hospital from Aug 2014 to Mar 2016 were sellected and devided into research group and control group in a computer random blind method, with 32 cases in each group. Pak tients in both group were given noninvasive positive pressure ventilation therapy and routine nursing care, and patients in research group were given comprehensive nursing intervention method at the same time. Condition cange of patients in each group were ob- served and their recovery period were compared. Results the recovery period of research group was significantly shorter than that of control group,and ifs total effective rate was significantly higher than that of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation combine comprehensive nursing intervention measures in severe bronchial asthma treatment can pro- mote the improvement of the patients and shorten the recovery period.
作者 汤新颜
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第A01期85-87,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 重症支气管哮喘 护理效果 无创正压通气 综合护理干预 severe bronchial asthma nursing effect noninvasive positive pressure ventilations comprehensive nursing interven-tion
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1王玉梅.布地奈德粉吸入剂与多索茶碱联合治疗支气管哮喘68例[J].新乡医学院学报,2007,24(3):297-299. 被引量:34
  • 2Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Cam- paign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Crit care Med,2013,41 (2) :580-637.
  • 3郭凤梅,邱海波.重症医学-十年循证带给我们的启示[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:1.10.
  • 4Gainnier M, Roth A, Forel JM, et al. Effect of neuromuscular bloc- king agents on gas exchange in patients presenting with acute re- spiratory distress syndrome [J] Crit Care Med, 2004,32 ( 1 ) : 113-119.
  • 5Forel JM, Roch A, Marin V, et al. Neuromuscular blocking agents decrease inflammatory response in patients presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Crit Care Med,2006,34( 11 ) : 2749 -2757.
  • 6Mereno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to qunantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care, re- suits of a prospective muhicentre study [ J ]. Intensive Care Med, 1999,25 ( 7 ) :686-696.
  • 7Jawan B, Kao YH, Goto S, et al. Propofol pretreatment attenuates LPS-induced granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production in cultured hepatocytes by suppressing MARK,/ERK activity and NF-kappa B translocation[ J]. Toxicol Appl Pharma- col ,2008,229 ( 3 ) :362-373.
  • 8Helmy SAK, AL-Attiyah RJ. The immunomodulatory effects of pro- longed intravenous infusion of propofol versus midzolam in critically ill surgical patients[J]. Anaesthesia,2001,56(1) :4-8.
  • 9Tsao CM, Wu CC, Liaw WJ, et al. Effects of midazolam on organ dysfunction in rats with endotoxaemia induced by lipopolysaccha- ride [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2009,47 ( 1 ) : 10-16.
  • 10Glanville AR, Theodore J, Baldwin JC, et al. Bronchial respon-siveness after human heart-lung transplantation [ J ]. Chest, 1990, 97(6) :1360-1366.

共引文献22

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部