摘要
目的评价利奈唑胺注射液联合亚胺培南西司他丁钠治疗粒细胞缺乏伴发热患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法方便选取山西大医院2013年1月—2016年12月期间收治的107例血液病粒细胞缺乏伴发热患者随机分为A(n=53)、B(n=54)两组,分别接受利奈唑胺联合亚胺培南西司他丁钠、盐酸万古霉素联合亚胺培南西司他丁钠静脉滴注治疗,比较两组的临床疗效和安全性。结果 A、B两组临床治疗总有效率分别为75.5%和72.2%(P>0.05),药物不良反应发生率分别为3.77%和16.67%(P<0.05),A组有效病例退热时间为(1.8±0.3)d,与B组(3.5±0.8)d比较,差异有统计学意义(t=14.50,P<0.05)。结论与盐酸万古霉素联用亚胺培南西司他丁钠静脉滴注治疗中性粒细胞缺乏伴发热比较,利奈唑胺联用亚胺培南西司他丁钠与其临床疗效相似,但退热起效时间快,且安全性更高。
Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect and safety of linezolid and imipenem and cilastatin sodium in treatment of patients with hematonosis agranulocytosis with fever.Methods 107 cases of patients with hematonosis agranulocytosis with fever admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 were convenient selected and randomly divided into two groups,the group A with 53 cases were treated with linezolid and imipenem and cilastatin sodium,while the group B with 54 cases adopted the intravenous drip of vancomycin hydrochloride and imipenem and cilastatin sodium,and the clinical curative effect and safety were compared between the two groups.Results The differences in the total effective rate between the group A and group B were not statistically significant（75.5% vs 72.2%）（P〈0.05）,and the difference in the incidence rate of adverse reactions of drugs between the group A and group B were statistically significant（3.77% vs 16.67%）（P〈0.05）,and the difference in the effective case defervescence time between the group A and group B was statistically significant[（1.8±0.3）d vs（3.5±0.8）d]（t=14.50,P〈0.05）.Conclusion The clinical curative effect of linezolid and imipenem and cilastatin sodium in treatment of patients with hematonosis agranulocytosis with fever is similar to that of vancomycin hydrochloride and imipenem and cilastatin sodium,and the defervescence onset time is rapid and the safety is higher.
出处
《中外医疗》
2017年第14期125-126,129,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
