期刊文献+

使用拉力螺钉与支撑钢板治疗Schatzker Ⅰ型胫骨平台骨折的临床疗效比较分析

Comparative analysis of the clinical effects of the treatment of Schatzker Ⅰ type tibial plateau fractures with lag screw and support plate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较应用两种不同内固定材料治疗SchatzkerⅠ型胫骨平台骨折的短期临床效果。方法:收治需要切开复位内固定的SchatzkerⅠ型胫骨平台骨折患者72例,随机平分两组。对比两组的临床疗效。结果:术后随访12~18个月,膝关节功能评估参照HSS评分标准,螺钉固定组与钢板固定组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:使用拉力螺钉与支撑钢板治疗SchatzkerⅠ型胫骨平台骨折的疗效均可靠。两种治疗方法治疗SchatzkerⅠ型胫骨平台骨折短期疗效无差别。 Objective:To compare the short term clinical effects of two different internal fixation materials for the treatment of Schatzker Ⅰ type tibial plateau fractures.Methods:72 cases of Schatzker type Ⅰ fractures of the tibia who need to be treated with open reduction and internal fixation were selected.They were randomly divided into the two groups on average.We compared the clinical efficacy of the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months.The knee function evaluation could refer to the HSS score standard.There was no significant difference between the screw fixation group and the steel plate fixation group(P>0.05).Conclusion:The results of the treatment of Schatzker Ⅰ type tibial plateau fractures with the use of lag screw and support plate are reliable.There was no difference in short-term curative effect of Schatzker type Ⅰ tibial plateau fractures treated by two treatments.
作者 谢友
出处 《中国社区医师》 2017年第18期62-63,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 胫骨平台骨折 内固定 拉力螺钉 SchatzkerⅠ型 Tibial plateau fracture Internal fixation Tension screw Schatzker type Ⅰ
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献30

  • 1卢世壁,主译,坎贝尔骨科手术学(上)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.2048-2049.
  • 2Mtiller ME, Nazarian S , Koch P,et al. The comprehensive classifica-tion of fractures of long bones [M]. New York: Springer, 1990: 148-156.
  • 3Schatzker JtMcBroom H,Bruce D. Tibial plateau fracture [J]. ClinOrthop, 1979,138: 94-104.
  • 4Hohl M,Moore TM. Articular fractures of the proximal tibia. In: E-varts CM,editor. Surgery of the musculoskeletal system [M]. 2nd ed.New Yoric: Churchill Livingstone,1990.
  • 5Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement forcategorical data[J]. Biometrics, 1977,33⑴:159-174.
  • 6Burstein AH. Fracture classification systems: do they work and arethey useful[J]? J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1993,75:1743-1744.
  • 7Kreder HJ'Hanel DP,McKee al. Consistency of AO fractureclassification for the distal radius [J]. J Bone Joint Surg (6r)y1996,78(5): 726-731.
  • 8Malek IA , Machani B,Mevcha AM.et al. Inter-observer reliabilityand intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of an-kle fractures [J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) ,2006,88(9): 1204-1206.
  • 9Wainwright AM,Williams JR,Carr AJ. Interobserver and intraob-server variation in classi-cation systems for fractures of the distalhumerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) ,2000,82: 636-642.
  • 10Walton NP,Harish S,Roberts C,et al. AO or Schatzker? How reli-able is classification of tibial plateau iractures [J]. Arch OrthopTrauma Surg,2003,123(8): 396-398.

共引文献11

;
使用帮助 返回顶部