期刊文献+

基于引文编年图探析文献计量学在护理领域的研究现状 被引量:4

Probe into research status quo of bibliometrics in nursing field based on citation chronological map
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探析文献计量学在护理领域的重要研究者和目前研究的主要内容。[方法]以Web of Science和Scopus两大引文数据库为检索平台,将护理领域中与文献计量学有关文献作为研究对象,借助引文分析软件Histcite和信息可视化软件CitespaceⅢ进行文献计量分析。[结果]该领域重要研究者有美国学者Oermann Marilyn H,Broome Marion E,英国学者Watson Roger及澳大利亚学者Smith Derek R;在主要研究内容中,护理研究和教育是本领域热点研究方向,期刊和出版物是主要研究对象,引文分析是使用的热点研究方法,影响因子和H指数是文献计量学在本领域研究的热点测度指标。[结论]文献计量学在护理领域的研究起步较晚,虽然近年研究内容日趋丰富但文献产出量不高,仍需加大该领域研究力度。 Objective:To explore the important researchers of bibliometrics in the nursing field and the main contents of current research.Methods:Web of Science and Scopus were taken as the retrieval platform,and the bibliometrics literature in the nursing field as the research objects,the Bibliometric analysis was carried out by means of citation analysis software HistCite and information visualization software Citespace Ⅲ.Results:The important researchers in this field including American scholar Oermann Marilyn H,Broome Marion E,British scholar Watson Roger and Australian scholar Smith Derek R.In the main research content,nursing research and education were the hotspots.Journal and publications were the main research objects,citation analysis was the hot research methods,and the impact factors and H-index were the hot measure indicators for bibliometrics in the field.Conclusions:Bibliometrics research started late in the nursing field.Although the research content in recent years has become increasingly rich,the literature output number was not large,still need to increase the research efforts in this field.
出处 《护理研究(上旬版)》 2017年第7期2333-2336,共4页 Chinese Nursing Researsh
基金 2014年辽宁省普通高等学校本科教育教学改革研究项目 编号:UPRP20140157
关键词 护理学 文献计量学 引文编年图 研究热点 护理领域 研究者 nursing science bibliometrics citation chronological map research hotspots nursing field researchers
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1R. Brian Haynes,陈耀龙(译),刁骧(审校).研究、综述、摘要、总结、系统:循证卫生保健决策的“5S”信息服务演进[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(5):330-332. 被引量:23
  • 2COLE F J, Hulme E W. The history of comparative anatomy-A statistical analysis of the literature [ J]. Science Progress, 1917 ( 11 ) : 578 - 596.
  • 3Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1926,16(12) :317 - 323.
  • 4Gross P L K, Gross E M. College libraries and chemical education [ J]. Science, 1927, 66 (1713) :385 -389.
  • 5Bradford S C. Sources of information on specific subjects[J].Engineering, 1934, 137 : 85 - 86.
  • 6Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas [ J ]. Science, 1955, 122 ( 3159 ) : 108 -111.
  • 7Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[ J]. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102 ( 46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 8Seglen O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research [ J ]. BMJ, 1997,314 (7079) :497 - 502.
  • 9Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[ J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 1973,24 (4) : 265 - 269.
  • 10Chen C. Generalised similarity analysis and pathfinder network scaling[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 1998,10 (2) :107 -128.

共引文献828

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

;
使用帮助 返回顶部