摘要
人们在评价腐败形势时往往将测量腐败与测量反腐败的指标相混合,造成认识上的混乱。本文提出了一个新的腐败测量框架,指出对腐败形势应该从腐败程度、反腐败强度和腐败风险三个维度分别进行评价。在总结中共十八大以来中国反腐倡廉建设举措和成效的基础上,本文应用这一框架评价中国当前的腐败形势:总体来说反腐败强度显著提高,尤其是在加大惩治力度、强化党内监督和完善党规体系等方面取得了突出成效,"反腐败斗争压倒性态势已经形成";腐败程度明显降低,但腐败现象仍具有集团性、日常性、顽固性的特点,腐败"形势依然严峻复杂";腐败风险仍然处于较高水平,需要通过进一步全面深化改革提升治理水平,反腐败斗争仍然具有长期性、复杂性和艰巨性的特点。当前中国的反腐败斗争正处于关键时期,经济转型社会的腐败演变"倒U字"形曲线拐点正在出现。
In previous literature,indicators measuring level of corruption and those measuring anticorruption achievements are usually mixed together during the evaluation of corruption situation.This has caused some confusions in understanding corruption.This paper presents a new framework,and argues that corruption situation should be evaluated from three dimensions,including level of corruption,intensity of anticorruption efforts,and corruption risks.Based on summary of progresses made in China's anticorruption campaign after the 18^(th) CPC National Congress,it applies this framework to evaluate China's current corruption situation.This paper finds out that,intensity of anticorruption efforts has been enhanced dramatically,especially on severer punishment of corrupt officials,strengthening of inner-Party supervision and improvement of CPC regulations,so that overwhelming status in fighting corruption has been achieved;however,corruption situation is still tough and complex since corruption phenomenon still appears to be organized,daily and inflexible;corruption risks remain high,which requires improvement of good governance through deepening of reform,and determines that the anticorruption campaign would last long-time and call for more efforts.China has entered an essential period in fighting against corruption,and is approaching the turning point in the inverted U curve of the evolvement of corruption situation in economic transition societies.
出处
《政治学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期2-11,共10页
CASS Journal of Political Science
基金
清华大学国情研究院承担的中宣部全国哲学社会科学规划办高端智库建设项目(20155010298)
全国哲学社会科学基金项目"十八大以来党中央反腐倡廉的新理念新思想新战略研究"(16ZZD024)的研究成果
关键词
腐败
腐败形势
反腐败
腐败风险
corruption
corruption situation
anticorruption
corruption risk