4Crow T R, Buckley D S, Nauertz E A, et al. Effects of management on the composition and structure of Northern hardwood forests in upper Michigan[J]. Forest Science, 2002, 48(1): 129-145.
5Lahde E, Laiho O, Nororpi, et al. Development of Norway spruce dominated stands after single-tree selection and low thinning[J]. Canadian Journal Forest Research, 2002, 32:1577-1584.
6Parrotta J A, Francis J K, Knowles O H. Harvesting intensity affects forest structure and composition in an upland Amazonian forest[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, 169:243-255.
7Scott T W, Chris C M. conifer response to three silvicultural treatments in the Oresgon Coast Range foothills[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2004,34(9): 1967-1978.
8Jaakkola T, Makinen H, Saren M, et al. Does thinning intensity affect the tracheid dimensions of Norway spruce[J]. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 2005,35(11):2685-2697.
9Gardingen P R, Clearwater M J, Nifinluri T, et al. Impacts of logging on the lowland forest in Indonesia [J]. Forestry Review, 1998, 77(2):71-82.
10Lei X D, Lu Y C, Peng C H, et al. Growth and structure development of semi-natural larch-spruce-fir forests in northeast China: 12-year results after thinning[J].Forest Ecology and Management, 2007,40( 1-3 ): 165 - 177.
