期刊文献+

液基薄层细胞学、高危型HPV、阴道镜下宫颈活检及LEEP术联合对宫颈上皮内瘤变诊治的应用价值 被引量:22

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨分析液基薄层细胞学、高危型人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、阴道镜下宫颈活检、宫颈LEEP术对宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊断和治疗的应用价值。方法选取行宫颈LEEP术的222例患者,对比分析其液基薄层细胞学、高危型HPV、阴道镜下宫颈活检结果、LEEP术后病理结果。结果 222例TCT中未见上皮内病变或恶性病变60例,意义不明的不典型鳞状细胞72例,不排除高度鳞状上皮内的非典型鳞状细胞24例,鳞状上皮内低度病变27例,鳞状上皮内高度病变39例,阳性检出率为82.0%。高危型HPV中阳性155例,阴性67例,其中16型最常见,共91例,其次为52型32例,51型20例,合并2种或以上混合感染者占20.6%,HPV阳性病例中CIN及宫颈癌检出率为96.1%,HPV阴性病例中CIN及宫颈癌检出率为92.5%。阴道镜下宫颈活检病理结果:慢性宫颈炎11例,CINⅠ79例,CINⅡ42例,CINⅢ71例,宫颈癌19例,合并HPV感染114例,HPV感染率为51.4%。阴道镜下宫颈活检检出率明显高于TCT的检出率,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=18.63,P<0.05),阴道镜下宫颈活检检出率明显高于高危型HPV检出率,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=45.181,P<0.05)。LEEP术后病理结果:慢性宫颈炎83例,CINⅠ78例,CINⅡ44例,CINⅢ71例,宫颈癌21例,CIN及宫颈癌检出率为96.4%,阴道镜下宫颈活检病理结果与LEEP术后病理结果比较差异未见统计学意义(χ~2=0.621,P>0.05)。结论 TCT、高危型HPV、阴道镜下宫颈活检可有效提高宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈癌的阳性检查率,为宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈癌的早发现、早诊断、早治疗提供临床依据,LEEP术在诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的同时也起到治疗作用,提高临床的治疗有效率。
作者 李雪梅
出处 《临床医学》 CAS 2017年第5期105-107,共3页 Clinical Medicine
基金 广东省广州市医药卫生科技项目(20162A010009)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1章文华,李淑敏,李楠,李洪君,李晓光,白萍,吴琨.318例宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床分析[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(9):666-669. 被引量:25
  • 2Tavassoli FA.乳腺及女性生殖器官肿瘤病理学和遗传学[M].程虹等译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.312.
  • 3Sykes, DY Harker, A Miller, et al, A randomised comparison ofSurePath liquid -based cytology and conventional smear cytology in a colposcopy clinic setting. BJOG,2008: 1375-1381.
  • 4Philip E, Castle, Johan Bulten. Age-specific patterns of unsatisfactory results for conventional pap smears and liquid-based cytology : data from two randomized clinical trials. BJOG,2010,117 (9): 1067-1073.
  • 5Shambulingappa, Pallagatti. Soheyl Sheikh Colposcopy : A new ray in the diagnosis of oral lesions indian. Journal of Dental Research, 2011,22(6):810-815.
  • 6Ahmed Ibrahim,Aija R Aro,Vibeke Rasch. Cervical cancer screening in primary health care setting in Sudan: a comparative study of visual inspection with acetic acid and Pap smear Int [J]. Womens Health,2012,4: 67-73.
  • 7Li R, Lewkowitz AK.Analysis of the effectiveness of visual inspection with acetic acid/Lugol^s iodine in one-time and annual follow-up screening in rural China. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2012,285(6):1627-1632.
  • 8Roura E,Iftner T,Vidart JA,et alPredictors of human papillomavirus infection in women undergoing routine cervical cancer screening in Spain: the CLEOPATRE study. BMC Infect Dis,2012,12(1); 145.
  • 9Wang S,Zhang S. The prevalence and role of human papillomavirus genotypes in primary cervical screening in the northeast of China. BMC Cancer,2012 ,12(1):160.
  • 10Hwang Y,Lee M Comparison of the Advan Sure human papillomavirus screening real-time PCR,the Abbott Real Time High Risk human papillomavirus test,and the Hybrid Capture human papillomavirus. DNA test for the detection of human papillomavirus. Ann Lab Med,2012,32(3):201-205.

共引文献147

同被引文献133

引证文献22

二级引证文献88

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部