期刊文献+

生命史权衡的内在机制:动机控制策略的中介作用 被引量:34

The intrinsic mechanism of life history trade-offs: The mediating role of control striving
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究基于生命史理论框架,通过整合生命史理论以及毕生发展动机理论的研究,进一步探索并验证生命史权衡的内在机制:动机控制策略(而非控制感)的中介效应。研究1采取问卷调查的方法,选取Mini-K量表以及首要–次级控制优化量表,结果表明,最优化策略、选择性首要控制以及选择性次级控制均发挥中介作用。研究2采用实验法,针对性地验证暴露在负性环境线索中的个体的最优化策略是否起中介作用,结果表明,最优化策略中介童年社会经济地位和延迟满足的关系。 This research integrates the life history theory and motivational theory of life-span development by exploring the intrinsic mechanism of life history trade-offs. Empirical work consists of two studies, both of which demonstrate the fact that control striving should be the intrinsic mechanism of life history trade-offs. Study One: 167 females and 63 males with a mean age of 26.6 years old (SD = 6.81) were measured with the inventories of Mini-K and Optimization in Primary and Secondary Control with the priming of "Recalling the important key events in your past life ..." in instructions. The results showed that Optimization, Selective Primary Control (SPC) and Selective Secondary Control (SSC) statistically mediated the effect of childhood economic environment on life history trade-offs respectively, with Compensatory Primary Control (CPC) and Compensatory Secondary Control (CSC) showing the similar statistical tendency. Study Two: 36 females and 35 males with a mean age of 26.9 years old (SD = 3.42) attended experiments in study 2. Through a rigorous experimental design with the priming of mortality cues, results showed that Optimization significantly mediated the effect of the individual's childhood economic status on delayed rewards under negative environmental condition.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期783-793,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 上海市哲社规划项目(2014BSH007) 国家社科规划项目(16BSH090) 复旦大学社会发展与公共政策学院科研发展基金资助
关键词 生命史理论 生命史权衡 内在机制 动机控制策略 中介效应 life history theory life history trade-offs intrinsic mechanism control striving mediating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献132

  • 1黄蕴智.延迟满足—— 一个值得在我国开展的研究计划[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(1):54-57. 被引量:37
  • 2埃里克·奥林·赖特.《后工业社会中的阶级》,沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2004年,第75页.
  • 3David R . Shaffer. Social & personality Development. Brooks / Cole Publishinh Company, 1996, 227 - 231.
  • 4Vangh, B. E., Kopp, C. B., & Krakow, J. B. The emergence and consolidation of self-control from eighteen to thirty months of age: Normative trends and individual difference. Child Development,1984, 55: 990- 1004.
  • 5Mischel, W., & Patterson, C. J. Substantive and structural elements of effective plans for self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34: 942-950.
  • 6Mischel, W., & Ebbesen, E. B. Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16: 329-337.
  • 7Mischel, H. N., & Mischel, W. The development of children's knowledge of serf-control strategies. Child Development, 1983, 53, 603-619.
  • 8Piaget, J. The construction of reality in the child. New York:Basic, 1954.
  • 9Posne, M, I. , & Rothbart, M. K. The development of attentional mechanisms. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1980, 28, 1 -52.
  • 10马克斯·韦伯.《开放的和封闭的关系》.[美]戴维·格伦斯基编.《社会分层》.华夏出版社,2005年版.第123页.

共引文献193

同被引文献270

引证文献34

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部