期刊文献+

交易费用对我国碳市场成本有效性的影响--基于国内碳交易试点间的模拟分析 被引量:14

Impacts of Transaction Costs on Cost Saving Effect of Carbon Trading Market in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 交易费用的广泛存在会削弱碳市场的成本有效性。本文首先构建了一个考虑交易费用的省际碳交易机制模型,从理论层面研究交易费用与碳价、交易量等变量的均衡关系。随后,以"十二五"期间六个碳交易试点为例,从成本有效性的视角探讨交易费用对我国碳市场的影响。结论显示交易费用与均衡碳价存在正向关系、与均衡交易量间存在反向关系,每增加一单位交易费用,均衡碳价大约上升0.57元,潜在碳交易量下降0.31百万吨。交易费用的增加将会抑制参与主体的交易积极性,进而降低碳市场的成本有效性。随着边际交易费用增加,天津和上海可能会率先退出市场,特别地,当边际交易费用高达70元/吨CO_2时,碳交易市场可能失效。本研究揭示了交易费用在碳市场设计中的重要性,未来我国构建全国统一碳市场需要考虑交易费用影响。 Transaction costs play a significant role in cost saving of carbon trading market. In this paper, we develop an inter-provincial carbon-trading model to theoretically examine the relationships between transaction costs and equilibrium carbon price and trading volumes, and empirically analyzing the impacts of transaction costs on cost-effectiveness of China' s carbon trading market. We find a positive relationship between equilibrium carbon price and transaction costs, and a negative relationship between transaction costs and trading volumes. Specifically, increase of the transaction cost by each unit leads the equilibrium price to increase by 0.57 Yuan and the trading volume to decrease by 0.31 million tons. Besides, the rising of transaction costs heavily restrains the trading initiative of market agents, then weakens the cost-effectiveness of permits trading market. As the transaction cost increases, Tianjin and Shanghai would be the first two agents staying out of the trading market ; if the marginal transaction cost crosses the threshold of 70 Yuan per ton of CO2 , the trading market will be in failure. This paper emphasizes the importance of transaction costs in mechanism design of carbon trading market, and indicates the policy makers should pay attention to the transaction costs for establishing the national united carbon trading market in the future.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第6期23-31,共9页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(71503001 71503242) 安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目(SK2015A214)
关键词 交易费用 省际碳交易市场 成本节约效应 transaction cost, inter-provincial carbon trading market, cost saving effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献108

  • 1郑爽.全球碳市场动态[J].气候变化研究进展,2006,2(6):281-285. 被引量:23
  • 2Burtraw D., Palmer K., Bharvirkar R. The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading[DB/OL]. RFF Discussion Papers dp-01-30, http://rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-01-30.pdf, 2001-08.
  • 3Cramton P., Kerr S. Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to Auction Not Grandfather[J]. Energy Policy, 2002,30(4):333- 345.
  • 4Edwards T. H., Hutton J. P. Allocation of Carbon Permits within a Country: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the United King- dom[J]. Energy Economics, 2001,23(4):371-386.
  • 5Fischer C., Alan K. F. Output-Based Allocation of Emissions Permits for Mitigating Tax and Trade Interactions[J]. Land Economics, 2007,83(4):575-599.
  • 6Jensen J., Rasmussen T. N. Allocation of CO2 Emission Permits: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000,40(2): 111-136.
  • 7Dinan T., Rogers D. L. Distributional Effects of Carbon Allowance Trading: How Government Decisions Determine Winners and Losers[J]. National Tax Journal, 2002,55(2):199-221.
  • 8Ellerman A. D., Wing I. S. Absolute versus Intensity-based Emissions Caps[J]. Climate Policy, 2003,3(S2):7-20.
  • 9Kuik O., Mulder M. Emissions Trading and Competitiveness: Pros and Cons of Relative and Absolute Schemes[J]. Energy Policy,2004,32(6):737-745.
  • 10Pizer W. The Case for Intensity Targets[DB/OL]. RFF Discussion Paper 05-02, http://wwwaforg/Documents/RFF-DP-05-02.pdtf. 2005-01.

共引文献141

同被引文献291

引证文献14

二级引证文献339

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部