摘要
《公司法》第16条是公司对外担保的核心条款,研究其规范性质对于违反该条的法律后果密切联系。就保护交易安全和平衡相关利益而言,对《公司法》第16条规范性质应区别不同情形进行分析。区分一般担保中的普通公司与上市公司,普通公司的一般担保应为管理性强制性规范,上市公司应认定为效力性强制性规范。而关联担保不区分两者,一律认定为效力性强制性规范。
Company law article 16 is the core of the company's external guarantees terms, study its speci- fication properties for breach of which the legal consequences of close contact. In terms of protection of trans- action security and balance the interests of company law article 16 specification properties should distinguish different cases are analyzed. Distinguish between general guarantee the ordinary companies and listed compa- nies, general guarantee shall be the administrative compulsory standard of ordinary company, the listed com- pany shall be deemed to be ineffective mandatory norms. And associated guarantees do not tween both, shall be deemed to be ineffective mandatory norms. distinguish be-tween both, shall be deemed to be ineffective mandatory norms.
作者
孙宛宛
王萌
SUN Wan-wan WANG Meng(School of Law, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, Chin)
出处
《海南广播电视大学学报》
2017年第2期73-77,共5页
Journal of Hainan Radio & TV University
关键词
《公司法》第16条
规范性质
强制性规范
the company law of 16th
specification properties
mandatory specification