基于高影响力综合期刊引用的期刊评价——以SCI源期刊的评价为例

Journal evaluation based on citation of high impact comprehensive journals:A case study on SCI journal evaluation

【目的】以高影响力期刊载文的引用具有较高的评价价值为出发点,提出一种区分引用来源的期刊评价的新途径。【方法】选择高影响力的综合期刊,运用CiteSpace软件对载文数据进行期刊共被引分析。以Nature和Science的引用为依据,根据聚类节点期刊的学科类别和被引频次判定不同学科领域的重要期刊。以某一学科内一组高影响力综合期刊的引用为依据,根据期刊的被引频次判定该学科的重要期刊。【结果】基于高影响力综合期刊载文的引用评价期刊,在原理上有较强的说服力。【结论】基于高影响力综合期刊载文引用的期刊评价,可以作为科研机构自主评价期刊的辅助方法。

[ Purposes] Based on the idea that the citation from an article published on a higher impact journal is more significant in journal evaluation, this study proposes a new journal evaluation method to distinguish the citation source. [ Methods] High impact comprehensive journals were selected for journal evaluation, and their article data were used for journal co-citation analysed by CiteSpace. Taking the citation from Nature and Science as criterion, the journals of different disciplines were evaluated by discipline category of cluster nodes and cited frequency. Taking the citation from a group of high impact comprehensive journals of a certain discipline as criterion, the journals of that discipline were evaluated by cited frequency. [ Findings ]Journal evaluation based on article citation of high impact journals is persuasive in theory. [ Conclusions ] The method could be taken as an auxiliary one for journal evaluation by research institutes independently.