期刊文献+

专利侵权诉讼周期分析报告 被引量:6

Patent Infringement Litigation Period Analysis Report
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前,专利维权方式中通过司法诉讼,专利权人获得的保护手段和保护力度相对而言最强,但实践中专利维权存在"时间长、举证难、成本高、赔偿低"等状况,为了从实证角度分析专利维权尤其是侵权诉讼的周期,从而为有关机关决策提供参考,本文选取了北京、上海、广州知识产权法院(包括三家法院成立前对应法院)以及深圳、长沙、武汉、杭州、南京、济南、成都、沈阳、郑州、西安中级人民法院作为样本法院,以样本以及多家中级法院在2011—2015年度(取样周期)内审结的专利侵权案件为统计对象,以案件所反映出的专利侵权诉讼周期为重点,分析样本法院专利侵权诉讼周期的实际状况。 Currently, compare to other methods, judicial litigation is considered to be the strongest solution to protect patentee's rights, however, in practice, issues are presented on "long period、hard to make testification、high cost and low indemnity". In order to analyze the patent infringement through solid evidences, especially the patent infringement litigation period, and to provide policy-making reference for appropriate organizations, this report chose Intellectual Property Courts in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou(including three corresponding courts before the three courts established) and intermediate people's courts in Shenzhen、Changsha、Wuhan、Hangzhou、Nanjing、Chengdu、Shenyang、Zhengzhou、Xi'an as sample courts, using specimen and patent infringement cases, concluded within 2011 to 2015(period of sampling) by multi intermediate people's courts, as statistical objects, and putting patent infringement litigation period, reflected by the cases, as the key point, further analyze the actual situation of the patent infringement litigation period from the sample courts.
作者
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2017年第6期31-45,共15页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 专利侵权 诉讼周期 法院 平均审理周期 2011—2015年度 patent infringement litigation period courts average trial period 2011-2015
  • 相关文献

同被引文献101

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部