期刊文献+

标准必要专利滥用的反垄断规制 被引量:2

Antimonopoly Regulating of Standard Essential Patents Abuse
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,随着我国企业开拓海外市场,遭遇标准必要专利相关诉讼和反垄断案件也随之增多,这些案件涉案金额高,专业性强,有些甚至涉及国家重大公共利益。然而,我国虽然逐步推动标准必要专利滥用规制体系的建立,但尚未形成我国自己特有的标准必要专利滥用的反垄断规制体系。本文在分析我国现行立法的基础上,提出标准必要专利滥用市场支配地位的行为界定、禁令救济限制和判定许可费率存在的问题,通过分析比较国内外标准必要专利滥用规制制度和侵权案例,提出完善我国标准必要专利滥用反垄断规制的对策,提出了相关市场范围的界定规则、禁令救济适用的情形、许可费率的衡量标准。 In recent years, lawsuilt and antitrust cases related to standards essential patents( SEP) are increased with the development of Chinese enterprises exploring overseas markets that involved high amount of money in these cases, the studies on these case need a strong professional method, and some even have huge impact on public interest of the country. Although the the establishment of SEPs regulation system was promoted industriously by Chinese government, the anti-monopoly legislation on intellectual property rights were rare, whats more, our own unique SEPs antitrust regulation system is not established. On the basis of our SEPs antitrust analysis about current legislation, the behavior of abuse market position were discussed, the injunctive relief and license fee issues are compared with the treatment abroad in such cases. By analysing and comparing with the international SEPs infringement cases, the advises are proposed to the establishment and improvement of SEPs antitrust regulation system. The methord on the means of SEPs antitrust regulation have been proposed that the scope and rule of SEPs relevant market, the principles about applications of SEPs owner's injunctive relief and the standard of license fee in the Chinese law.
作者 马兰 冯宪芬 MA Lan FENG Xianfen
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2017年第6期86-91,共6页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 标准必要专利 反垄断 规制 Standard Essential patents abuse regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献47

  • 1王晓哗:《反垄断法》,法律出版社2011年版,第140页.
  • 2(2011)深中法知民初字第858号.
  • 3(2013)粤高法民三终字第306号.
  • 4The U. S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAl. PROPERTY RIGHTS: Promoting Innovation and Competition, Issued on April 2007, at 33, https://www, ftc. gov/sites/ d c faul t! fi 1 e s/doc u m ent s/reports/antitru st- e nforc e m ent- an d- i n t : 11 e c t ual-p roperty- r i ghts- pro mot in g- i n n o vat i o n- an d- c ompe t i t ion- report, s. department-justiee-and-federal-trade-commission/p040101 promotinginoovationandcompetitionrpt0704, pdf ( Last visited on August 27, 2015).
  • 5《中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会行政处罚决定书》,发改办价监处罚[2015]1号,载http://www.sdpcgov.cn/gzdt/201503/t20150302_666209.html,最后访问时间:2015年8月3日.
  • 6商务部公告2012年第25号,载http://fl:.mofcom问:2015年8月3日.
  • 7商务部公告2014年第24号,载http://ndj.mofcom.gov.cn/article/ztxx/201404/20140400542415.shtml,最后访问时I司:2015年8月3日.
  • 8(2011)深中法知民初字第857号和(2011)深中法知民初字第858号.
  • 9(2013)粤高法民三终字第306号和(2013)粤高法民三终字第305号.
  • 10See D. Daniel Sokol & Wentong Zheng, FRAND in China,21? Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 69? (2014).

共引文献125

引证文献2

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部