期刊文献+

射频导管消融术治疗心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者的临床效果 被引量:13

Clinical effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on patients with heart failure complicated with atrial fibrillation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨射频导管消融术治疗心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者的临床效果。方法 选择2012年 3月至2015年6月于首都医科大学宣武医院经射频导管消融术治疗的26例心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者(左心室射血分数<45%)为观察组,并选择同期58例无充血性心力衰竭的心房颤动患者为对照组。比较2组患者手术成功率和治疗前后左心功能。结果 观察组与对照组患者手术成功率比较[73.1%(19/26)比79.3%(46/58)],差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组治疗后左心房内径及左心室舒张末期内径明显小于治疗前,左心室射血分数明显高于治疗前[(41±5)mm比(47±5)mm、(49±3)mm比(58±5)mm、(57±6)%比(41±7)%](均P<0.05)。结论 射频导管消融术治疗心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者效果明显。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on patients with heart failure complicated with atrial fibrillation. Methods Twenty-six patients with heart failure complicated with atrial fibrillation who had radiofrequency catheter ablation from March 2012 to June 2015 in Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University were enrolled as observation group, 58 patients with atrial fibrillation without congestive heart failure(left ventricular ejection fraction〈45%) were enrolled as control group. The operation success rate and left ventricular function before and after treatment were analyzed. Results The operation success rate had no significant difference between observation group and control group[73.1%(19/26) vs 79.3%(46/58)](P〉0.05). Left atrial diameter and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in observation group after treatment were significantly lower and left ventricle ejection fraction was significantly higher than those before treatment[(41±5)mm vs (47±5)mm, (49±3)mm vs (58±5)mm, (57±6)% vs (41±7)%](P〈0.05). Conclusion Radiofrequency catheter ablation is effective in the treatment of heart failure complicated with atrial fibrillation.
作者 史力生 夏经钢 孔强 Shi Lisheng Xia Jinggang Kong Qiang(Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China)
出处 《中国医药》 2017年第7期986-989,共4页 China Medicine
关键词 心力衰竭 心房颤动 导管消融术 Heart failure;Atrial fibrillation;Catheter ablation
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation : recommendations for patient selection, proce- dural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) , a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS) ; and in collaboration with the Amer- ican College of Cardiology ( ACC ) , American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the gover- ning bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac ArrhythmiaSociety, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society[J]. Heart Rhythm, 2012,9(4) :632- 696. e21. DOI: 10.1016/j. hrthm. 2011.12. 016.
  • 2January CT, Warm LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Asso- ciation Task Force on Practice Guidelinesand the Heart Rhythm So- ciety[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014,64(21):el-76. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jaee. 2014.03. 022.
  • 3Ad N, Suri RM, Gammie JS, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fi- brillation trends and outcomes in North America[ Jl. J Thorac Car- diovasc Surg, 2012,144 (5) : 1051-1060. DOI : 10. 1016/j. jtcvs. 2012.07. 065.
  • 4Cox JL. A brief overview of surgery for atrial fibrillation [ J ]. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2014,3 ( 1 ) :80-88. DOI: 10. 3978/j. issn. 2225-319X. 2014.01.05.
  • 5Ngaage DL, Schaff HV, Barnes SA, et al. Prognostic implications of preoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: is there an argument for concomitant arrhythmia sur- gery? [J~. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006,82(4):1392-1399. DOI: 10. 1016/j. athoracsur. 2006.04. 004.
  • 6Saxena A, Dinh DT, Reid CM, et al. Does preoperative atrial fi- brillation portend a poorer prognosis in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement? A muhicentre Australian study[ J]. Can J Cardiol, 2013,29(6) :697-703. DOI: 10. 1016/j. cjca. 2012. 08. 016.
  • 7Kalavrouziotis D, Buth K J, Vyas T, et al. Preoperative atrial fibril- lation decreases event-free survival following cardiac surg~ ~y [ J ]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009,36(2) :293-299. DOI: 10. 1016/ j. ejcts. 2009.02. 030.
  • 8Izumoto H, Kawazoe K, Eishi K, et al. Medium-term results after the modified Cox/Maze procedure combined with other cardiac sur- gery[J~. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000, 17 ( 1 ) :25-29. DOI: 10. 1016/S1010-7940 (99) 00346-2.
  • 9Bugge E, Nicholson IA, Thomas SP. Comparison of bipolar and uni- polar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo experimental model [ J ]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,28 ( 1 ) :76-82. DOI: 10. lO16/j. ejcts. 2005.02. 028.
  • 10Hamner CE, Lutterman A, Potter DD, et al. Irrigated bipolar ra- diofrequency ablation with transmurality feedback for the surgical Cox-Maze procedure [ J ]. Heart Surg Forum, 2003,6 ( 5 ) : 418- 423. DOI: 10. 1016/j. athoracsur. 2005.06. 017.

共引文献2

同被引文献102

引证文献13

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部