期刊文献+

妊娠合并主动脉夹层或合并主动脉瘤的临床分析 被引量:6

Clinical features of pregnancy complicated with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究妊娠合并主动脉夹层或合并主动脉瘤患者的临床分析。方法 回顾性分析2006年 1月至2016年2月于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院分娩的合并主动脉夹层或合并主动脉瘤的32例孕产妇作为病例组。选择同期本院分娩的无合并主动脉夹层或合并主动脉瘤的65例孕产妇作为对照组。根据妊娠合并疾病类型,将病例组分为主动脉夹层组(24例)和主动脉瘤组(8例);将对照组分为正常组(35例)和高血压组(30例)。收集和分析所有孕产妇临床资料。结果 主动脉夹层组孕产妇死亡率和胎儿丢失发生率明显高于正常组、高血压组和主动脉瘤组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。高血压组的早产儿发生率均明显高于其他3组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。主动脉瘤组和主动脉夹层组早产儿发生率明显高于正常组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。主动脉夹层组终止妊娠孕周小于正常组、高血压组和主动脉瘤组[30(22,35)周比37(37,38)、36(32,38)、32(14,38)周],胸背痛发生率高于其他3组[100.0%(24/24)比0.0%(0/35)、0.0%(0/30)、1/8],主动脉宽度水平高于其他3组[(5.5±1.7)cm比(2.8±0.4)、(3.0±0.4)、(5.1±1.1)cm],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。主动脉瘤组主动脉宽度大于正常组和高血压组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。主动脉夹层组白细胞计数、中性粒细胞比例和中性粒细胞计数均高于其他3组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。主动脉瘤组中性粒细胞比例均低于正常组和高血压组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。4组D-二聚体水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 妊娠合并主动脉夹层或合并主动脉瘤的孕产妇以胸背痛为主要临床表现,关注主动脉和血压,结合辅助检查,做到初诊及时准确,保障母婴生命安全。 Objective To analyze clinical features of pregnancy complicated with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm. Methods A total of 97 pregnant women with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm from January 2006 to February 2016 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University were retrospectively analyzed; 32 women had aortic dissection/aortic aneurysm(observation group); 65 cases without aortic lesion were control group. The observation group was divided into aortic dissection group(24 cases) and aortic aneurysm group(8 cases). The control group was divided into normal group(35 cases) and hypertension group(30 cases). Clinical data were analyzed. Results The death rate and fetal loss rate in aortic dissection group were significantly higher than those in normal group, hypertension group and aortic aneurysm group(P〈0.05). The preterm rate in hypertension group was significantly higher than that in normal group, aortic aneurysm group and aortic dissection group(P〈0.05); the preterm rate in aortic aneurysm group and aortic dissection group were significantly higher than that in normal group(P〈0.05). The gestational week in aortic dissection group was significantly less, the incidence of chest pain was significantly higher and the width of aorta was significantly wider than those in normal group, hypertension group and aortic aneurysm group[30(22, 35)weeks vs 37(37, 38), 36(32, 38), 32(14, 38)weeks; 100.0%(24/24) vs 0.0%(0/35), 0.0%(0/30), 1/8; (5.5±1.7)cm vs (2.8±0.4),(3.0±0.4),(5.1±1.1)cm](P〈0.05); the width of aorta in aortic aneurysm group was significantly wider than that in normal group and hypertension group(P〈0.05). White blood cell count, neutrophil ratio and neutrophil count in aortic dissection group were significantly higher than those in other 3 groups(P〈0.05); neutrophil ratio in aortic aneurysm group was significantly lower than that in normal group and hypertension group(P〈0.05). The level of D-dimer had no significant difference among 4 groups(P〉0.05). Conclusions Chest pain is a main clinical manifestation in pregnant women with aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm. Blood pressure monitoring and accessory laboratory examinations help timely diagnosis and ensure the safety of mother and baby.
作者 褚黎 张军 李燕娜 李海洋 秦彦文 Chu Li Zhang Jun Li Yanna Li Haiyang Qin Yanwen(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China Research Laboratory of Upper Airway, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing 100029, Chin)
出处 《中国医药》 2017年第7期1053-1057,共5页 China Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(91439127)
关键词 主动脉瘤 主动脉夹层 妊娠 Aortic aneurysm;Aortic dissection;Pregnancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1金小岩,施旖旎,蒋龙元.D-二聚体在主动脉夹层中的临床意义[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2008,13(6):423-424. 被引量:6
  • 2李淑娟,胡文立,王艳丽,操斌全.血D-二聚体浓度对主动脉夹层的诊断价值[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(3):166-168. 被引量:24
  • 3刘晓光,井景,袁超,付文军.D-二聚体在不同类型和病期主动脉夹层患者中的检测结果分析[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(5):340-342. 被引量:21
  • 4鄢韵升.急性主动脉夹层患者血清D-二聚体变化的临床意义[J].重庆医科大学学报,2012:134.
  • 5Hjermstad M J,Fayers P M,Haugen D F,et al.Studies com-paring numerical rating scales?verbal rating scales,and visualanalogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults:Asystematic literature review[J].J Pain Symptom Manage,2011,41(6):1073-1093.
  • 6Lida F,Habib E,Kamran S.Comparison of visual analoguescale and faces rating scale in measuring acute postoperativepain[J].Arch Intern Med,2009,12(1);73-75.
  • 7Sato F,Kitamura T,Kongo M? et al.Newly diagnosed acuteaortic dissection characteristics,treatment modifications,andoutcomes[J].Int Heart J,2005,46(6):1083-1098.
  • 8Hagan P G,Nienaber C A,Isselbacher E M,et al.The Inter-national Registry of Acute Aortic DissectionC IRAD):new in-sights into an old disease[J].JAMA,2000,283(7):897-903.
  • 9Santini F,Montalbano GtGasali G,et al.Clinical presentationis the main predictor of in-hospital death for patients with a-cute type A aortic dissection admitted for surgical treatment:a25 years experience[J].Int J Cardiol,2007,115(3):305-311.
  • 10Tsai T T,Trimarchi S,Nienaber C A.Acute aortic dissection:perspectives from the International registry of acute aorticdissection(IRAD)[J].Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg,2009,37(2):149-159.

共引文献15

同被引文献28

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部