期刊文献+

国际税收争议仲裁解决机制的世界趋势与中国立场 被引量:12

Research on the World Trend and Chinese Policy of International Tax Dispute Arbitration Mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 在世界经济发展的新态势下,国际合作与贸易壁垒并存,国际税收争议日益增加。传统解决国际税收争议的相互协商程序逐渐暴露出不效率、纳税人参与程度低、并不能必然解决税收争议等缺陷。于是人们把目光投向了国际税收争议的仲裁解决路径上。一方面,在旧有的国际投资仲裁中,涉税投资仲裁已经颇具规模;另一方面,在投资之外的领域,OECD、欧盟、国际商会等国际组织以及美国、德国等主要贸易国家也在力推税收仲裁机制。在仲裁机制逐步创新发展与税收争议解决需求日益增长的共同作用下,国际税收争议的仲裁解决路径逐渐呈现出良好的发展态势。就我国而言,通过近年的经济增长,以及"一带一路""自贸区建设"等政策推动,正逐渐从被投资国向投资国、从次要贸易国向国际主要贸易国转型。在此背景之下,仲裁是更能保护纳税人与我国"走出去"企业纠纷的解决方式,应在适当时机审慎推动国际税收仲裁在我国的适用,构筑与国际接轨的税收纠纷解决法律体系。 Under the new situation of world economic development, the traditional mutual consultation procedure to solve the international tax disputes gradually became inefficiency. Considering the defects, many people suggest that arbitration may be a good way to solve international tax disputes. International organizations such as OECD, the European Union, the International Chamber of Commerce and many developed countries such the U.S. and Germany have adopted this solution. With the gradual development of the arbitration mechanism and the increasing demand of the settlement of tax disputes, the solution of the international tax dispute settlement has shown a good development trend. In recent years, with the economic growth, "One Belt One Road", "free trade zone" and other policies, China has gradually transformed from an invested country into an investing country, from a secondary trade country into a leading international trade country. Under this background, to protect the taxpayer and our "going out" enterprises to resolve disputes, China should implement the international tax arbitration s in right time and construct the international tax dispute settlement system.
作者 欧阳天健
出处 《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第3期149-160,共12页 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基金 国家社会科学基金资助重点项目"中国(上海)自由贸易实验区税收法制问题研究"(14AFX020) 华东政法大学优秀博士学位论文培育项目"税法拟制论"(2017-1-008)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 国际税收纠纷 仲裁 转型 International tax dispute Arbitration Reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献46

  • 1崔晓静.欧盟税收《仲裁公约》及其借鉴[J].涉外税务,2005(9):31-35. 被引量:6
  • 2Hugh J. Ault, 2005, Improving the Resolution of International Tax Disputes, Florida Tax Review, Vol. 7 , No.3.
  • 3欧盟《仲裁公约》第9条第1款和第5款.
  • 42006年欧盟《仲裁公约实施行为手则》42(b)款.
  • 5欧盟《仲裁公约》第9条第3款.
  • 6欧盟《仲裁公约》第10条.
  • 7欧盟《仲裁公约》第6条、第7条、第13条.
  • 8欧盟《仲裁公约》第8条.
  • 9OECD, 1984, Transfer Pricing and Multinational Enterprises-Three Taxation Issues, Para.63, 1984.
  • 10OECD, 1995, Transfer Pricing and Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administration, Para.4.167-4.171.

共引文献58

引证文献12

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部