期刊文献+

A structural relationship between place attachment and intention to conserve landscapes–a case study of Harz National Park in Germany 被引量:4

A structural relationship between place attachment and intention to conserve landscapes–a case study of Harz National Park in Germany
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Place attachment is an important motivation for people to spend more time outdoors and to protect landscapes.This study explores visitors' intention to conserve natural landscapes based on the relationship with their place attachment to National Park landscape. Structural equation modelling(SEM) was used to determine the relationship between landscape conservation and place attachment. A survey with a structured questionnaire was administered to visitors to the seven designated hiking courses of Harz National Park in Germany. The path coefficient of 0.77 revealed that place dependence positively and significantly affected place attachment, whereas place identity did not. Place attachment had a significant effect on both affective appraisals and visiting satisfaction. Higher place attachment led to higher emotional reaction to landscapes on site and higher satisfaction of visiting the park. Among the variables, visiting satisfaction, but not affective appraisals, played a statistically significant mediating role between place attachment and conservation intention. With a path coefficient of 0.86, conservation intention was highly affected by visiting satisfaction. These results suggest that the managers of National Parks should focus on increasing visiting satisfaction based on how visitors are emotionally bonded with their visiting places, in order to enhance the intentions to conserve the landscape of the visitors to National Parks. Place attachment is an important motivation for people to spend more time outdoors and to protect landscapes.This study explores visitors' intention to conserve natural landscapes based on the relationship with their place attachment to National Park landscape. Structural equation modelling(SEM) was used to determine the relationship between landscape conservation and place attachment. A survey with a structured questionnaire was administered to visitors to the seven designated hiking courses of Harz National Park in Germany. The path coefficient of 0.77 revealed that place dependence positively and significantly affected place attachment, whereas place identity did not. Place attachment had a significant effect on both affective appraisals and visiting satisfaction. Higher place attachment led to higher emotional reaction to landscapes on site and higher satisfaction of visiting the park. Among the variables, visiting satisfaction, but not affective appraisals, played a statistically significant mediating role between place attachment and conservation intention. With a path coefficient of 0.86, conservation intention was highly affected by visiting satisfaction. These results suggest that the managers of National Parks should focus on increasing visiting satisfaction based on how visitors are emotionally bonded with their visiting places, in order to enhance the intentions to conserve the landscape of the visitors to National Parks.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2017年第5期998-1007,共10页 山地科学学报(英文)
基金 supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2015-013-20150012)
关键词 地方附件 地方的感觉 山森林 结构的方程模型 风景偏爱 Place attachment Sense of place Mountain forests Structural Equation Model Landscape preference
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献67

  • 1Abello RP, Bernaldez FG, Galiano EF (1986) Consensus and contrast components in landscape preference. Environment and Behavior 18: 155-176. DOI: lO.1177/oo13916586182OOl.
  • 2Allendorf DT, Aung M, Songer M (2012) Using residents' perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chattin Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar. Journal of Environmental Management 99: 36-43. DOI: lO.lO16/j.jenvman.2012.Ol.OO4.
  • 3Andersson K, Lindgren M, Lundgren P (2005) Customer and stakeholder analysis [Kund- och intressent analys]. In: Slutrapport, (Final report). Kairos Future AB (Kairos Future Inc.) (In Swedish).
  • 4Arnberger A (2006) Recreation use of urban forests: An inter- area comparison. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4(3-4): 135-144. DOI: lO.1O16/j.ufug.2006.o1.oo4.
  • 5Arnberger A, Eder R (2012a) Exploring coping behaviours of Sunday and workday visitors due to dense use conditions in an urban forest. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11: 439- 449. DOI: 1O.lO16/j.ufug.2012.o8.oo2.
  • 6Arnberger A, Eder R (2012b) The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11: 41-49. DOI: lO.lOl6/j.ufug.2011.ll.OO3.
  • 7Beza B (2OLO) The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A case study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning 97:3o6-317.DOI: lO.lO16/j.landurbplan.2olo.o7.oo3.
  • 8Bj6rk J, Albin M, Grahn P, et al. (2008) Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62: e2. DOI: 1o.1136/jech.2007.o62414.
  • 9Brown TJ, Kaplan R, Quaderer G (1999) Beyond accessibility; preference for natural areas. Therapeutic recreation journal 33(3): eo9-2a1.
  • 10Buijs A (~oo9) Public Natures: Social representations of nature and local practices. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.

共引文献4

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部