期刊文献+

GnRH-a/Gn长方案控制性卵巢刺激中卵巢慢反应患者的影响因素 被引量:2

Influencing factors related to suboptimal ovarian response in patients with controlled ovarian stimulation by GnRH-a/Gn long protocol
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在体外受精—胚胎移植周期中采用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂/促性腺激素(GnRH-a/Gn)长方案控制性卵巢刺激治疗中出现卵巢慢反应患者的影响因素。方法采用GnRH-a/Gn长方案进行卵巢控制性刺激出现卵巢慢反应的患者资料(卵巢慢反应组),共38例,38个周期;选取同期采用相同方案进行控制性卵巢刺激卵巢反应正常(5个<获卵数<20个)的患者(卵巢反应正常组),共172例,172个周期。比较分析2组患者年龄、孕产史、卵巢手术史、体重指数、血脂水平(甘油三脂、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白和低密度脂蛋白)、基础血激素水平、促甲状腺激素、窦卵泡数、降调后血清雌二醇、降调后血清促黄体生成素值及促性腺激素启动剂量与卵巢慢反应的关系。结果患者年龄、孕产史、体重指数、血脂水平、基础血激素水平、促甲状腺激素及窦卵泡数,在2组之间均无统计学差异;降调后促黄体生成素值卵巢慢反应组低于卵巢反应正常组(P<0.05);卵巢手术史与卵巢慢反应的发生呈正相关(P<0.05);其余均无统计学意义。结论促性腺激素释放激素激动剂降调后促黄体生成素值过低,预示卵巢慢反应,且卵巢手术史是发生卵巢慢反应的高危因素。 Objective To explore the influential factors of suboptimal ovarian response in infertile patients undergoing gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/gonadotropin(GnRH-a/Gn) long protocol in controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer(IVF-ET) cycles,since there is a positive correlation between ovarian operation history and suboptimal ovarian response.Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted of infertile women with slow ovarian response who had undergone IVF/ICSI treatment by conventional GnRH-a/Gn long protocol from Janary 2014 to Janary 2016 at Reproductive Medicine Hospital,First Hospital of Lanzhou University,with a total of 38 cases including 38 cycles(a slow response group);172 cases including 172 cycles in a normal ovarian response group(5 numbers of follicle obtained 20) which were treated with the same protocol at the same period.The ages of patients,pregnancy history,history of ovarian surgery,body mass index,blood lipid level,basic sex hormones,follicle stimulating hormone(FSH),initial antral follicle count,estradiol and luteinizing hormone levels after down-regulation,application doses of Gn were all compared between the two groups,to probe their relations with slow ovarian response.Results The age,pregnancy history,body mass index,blood lipid level,basic sex hormones,FSH,initial antral follicle count had manifested significant difference between the suboptimal ovarian responders and normal ovarian responders(P〈0.05).luteinizing hormone levels after pituitary down-regulation in slow response group was statistically significantly lower than that in the normal ovarian response group(P〈0.05).Others showed no statistical difference.Conclusion The low levels of luteinizing hormone after Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist down-regulation may predict a slow ovarian response.And operations on ovary are a high risk factor of suboptimal ovarian response.
作者 石馨 杨媛 张学红 Shi Xin Yang Yuan Zhang Xue-hong(Reproductive Medicine Hospital, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Chin)
出处 《兰州大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2017年第3期48-51,57,共5页 Journal of Lanzhou University(Medical Sciences)
关键词 促性腺激素释放激素激动剂/促性腺激素长方案 卵巢慢反应 控制性卵巢刺激 卵巢手术史 临床特征 gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist/gonadotropin long protocol suboptimal ovarian response controlled ovarian stimulation ovarian surgery clinical characters
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1Veeck L. Preembryo grading and degree of cytoplasmic fragmentation. In: Veeck Led. An atlas of human gamates and conceptuses: A illustrated reference for assisted reproductive technology. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group, 1999:46-51.
  • 2Prato LD, Borini A, Coticchio G, et al. Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study. Hum Reprod, 2004 ; 19(10) : 2200-2205.
  • 3Yim SF, Lok IH, Cheung LP, et al. Dose-finding study for the use of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues prior to ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod,2001;16 (3): 492-494.
  • 4Tesarik J. Luteinizing hormone affects uterine receptivity independently of ovarian function. RBM Online, 2003 ; 7 (1) : 59- 64.
  • 5Bourgan C, Ubaldi F, Tavaniotou A, et al. Endometrial hormone receptors and proliferation index in the periovulatory phase of stimulated embryo transfer cycles in comparison with natural cycles and relation to clinical pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril, 2002 ; 78(2) : 237-244.
  • 6Tesarik J, Mendoza C. Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence. Hum Reprod,2002;17(12) :3129-3137.
  • 7Fleming R, Chung CC, Yates RW, et al. Purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone induces different hormone protiles compared with menotrophins, dependent upon the rote lf administration and endogenous luteinizing hormone activity. Hum Reprod, 1996 ; 11 (9) : 1854-1858.
  • 8Fleming R, Lloyd F, Herbert M, et al. Effects of profound suppression of luteinizing hormone during ovarian stimulation on follicular activity, oocyte and embryo function in cycles stimulated with purified follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod,1998 ;13(7) : 1788-1792.
  • 9Noci I, Biagiotti R, Maggi M, et al. Low day 3 luteinizing hormone values are predictive of reduced response to ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod, 1998 ; 13(3) : 531-534.
  • 10庄广伦.现代辅助生殖技术.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:140-142.

共引文献22

同被引文献16

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部