期刊文献+

东海区风场降尺度模拟影响因子研究 被引量:1

Influence factors on dynamical downscaling of sea surface winds over East China Sea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于中尺度WRF模式,采用NCEP FNL最终分析资料作为初始场和侧边界条件,以2009年为例,对中国东海区风场进行了动力降尺度研究,旨在检验WRF模式长期积分的动力降尺度能力,并考察动力降尺度方法在东海区的适用情况,为东海区多年时间尺度的风场降尺度研究提供参考。结果表明,3种不同积分方式模拟的风场均能较好地描述东海区风场的季节变化,且整体在冬季的模拟,要优于夏季的模拟。5DAY试验模拟效果最优,其他两组试验稍差。说明每5 d更新一次初始场的积分方式能够最好地描述东海区风场。每10 d更新一次初始场比起1 a连续积分模拟效果并无优势,连续长期积分模拟虽会导致系统误差累积,但定期更新初始场的方法并不一定能有效改善东海区风场的模拟效果。对于加入谱逼近方案的3种积分方式模拟的风场,每10 d更新一次初始场的试验对加入谱逼近方案响应最为明显。但就总体试验效果,5DAYS试验模拟效果仍然是最好的。加入谱逼近方案使得1 a连续积分这种积分方式模拟效果变差。由此说明,加入谱逼近方案后,采用5 d更新一次初始场的方式驱动,每次积分时间较短,初始场的作用还较强,故其改善效果不如10 d更新一次初始场;对于1 a连续积分,谱逼近方案使得初始场的改变导致了连续积分的误差积累增大。 For the representation of the winds over the East China Sea, the paper investigated the applicability of dynamically downscaling the NCEP FNL (Final Analysis ) data by the weather and research forecasting (WRF) model. Three numerical experiments were conducted: 1 ) simply 1-year control integration of WRF ( i.e., YEAR) ; 2) update the FNL initialization data every 5 days ( i. e., 5DAY) ; and 3) update the FNL initialization data every 10 days (i.e., 10DAY). The results showed that all the three experiments were able to simulate the winds reasonably, especially in winter, and the experiment 5DAY preformed best among them. Moreover, the paper added the spectral nudging scheme into the three experiments and explored its effects on each experiment.
作者 刘祥宇 陈学恩 张洪欣 LIU Xiangyu CHEN Xueen ZHANG Hongxin(College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China North China Sea Marine Technical Support Center, SOA, Qingdao 266033, China)
出处 《海洋气象学报》 2017年第2期74-82,共9页 Journal of Marine Meteorology
基金 国家重点研发计划专项(2016YFC1401300) 海洋公益性行业科研专项(201505007) 山东省重点研发计划项目(2016CYJS04A01)
关键词 WRF模式 降尺度 谱逼近方案 WRF model downscaling spectral nudging scheme
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

  • 1李鲲,徐幼平,宇如聪,程锐.梅雨锋上三类暴雨特征的数值模拟比较研究[J].大气科学,2005,29(2):236-248. 被引量:29
  • 2高学杰,徐影,赵宗慈,Jeremy S.PAL,Filippo GIORGI.数值模式不同分辨率和地形对东亚降水模拟影响的试验[J].大气科学,2006,30(2):185-192. 被引量:116
  • 3鲍艳,吕世华,左洪超,侯瑞卿.RegCM3模式在西北地区的应用研究Ⅱ:区域选择及参数化方案的敏感性[J].冰川冻土,2006,28(2):175-182. 被引量:29
  • 4Briegleb B P. 1992. Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model. J Geophys Res, 97. 7603 -7612.
  • 5Castro C L, Pielke R A, Leoncini G. 2005. Dynamical downscaling: Assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J Geophys Res, 110( D05) : 108, Doi:10. 1029/2004JD004,721.
  • 6Chen F, Dudhia 3. 2001. Coupling and advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon Wea Rev, 129:569-585.
  • 7Davies H C. 1976. A lateral boundary formulation for multi-levels prediction models. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 102:405-418.
  • 8Feser F. 2006. Enhanced detectability of added value in limited-area model results separated into different spatial scales. Mon Wea Rev, 134:2180- 2190.
  • 9Giorgi F, Marinuci M R. 1996. An investigation of the sensitivity of simulated precipitation to model resolution and its implications for climate studies. Mon Wea Rev, 124(1) 148-166.
  • 10Giorgi F. 2006. Regional climate modeling: Status and perspectives. J Phys IV, 139.101- 118.

共引文献12

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部