期刊文献+

前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级相关危险因素分析 被引量:4

Risk factors of Gleason score upgrade in patients undergone radical prostatectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级的相关危险因素。方法回顾性分析2014年8月至2016年9月175例行前列腺癌根治术患者的年龄、前列腺特异性抗原PSA、前列腺体积、穿刺阳性针数和穿刺癌组织最大占比等指标,统计穿刺与根治术后Gleason评分差异,并应用Logistic回归分析前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级的危险因素。结果 175例患者中,44例(25.1%)出现术后病理Gleason评分较穿刺前升高。前列腺体积是前列腺癌根治术后Gleason评分升级的独立预测因素。结论前列腺体积较小的前列腺癌患者,术后Gleason评分发生升级的可能性较大。 Objective To explore the risk factors for the upgrading of Gleason score radical prostatectomy(RP).Methods The study cohort consisted of 175 men treated with RP.The patients'age,serum prostate specific antigen(PSA),prostate volume,positive rate of puncture,maximal duty ratio of cancerous tissue,and changes of Gleason score were analyzed.The risk factors of Gleason score upgrading were analyzed with Logistic regression.Results Of all 175 patients,44 had(25.1%)upgraded Gleason score.In multivariate logistic regression models,the prostate volume was independent predictor of Gleason score upgrading.Conclusion Small prostate volume may be the predictor of Gleason score upgrading after RP.
作者 陈伟 周鹏 葛力源 赵晓智 纪长威 连惠波 刘光香 张士伟 李笑弓 甘卫东 郭宏骞 CHEN Wei ZHOU Peng GE Li-yuan ZHAO Xiao-zhi JI Chang-wei LIAN Hui-bo LIU Guang-xiang ZHANG Shi-wei LI Xiao-gong GAN Wei-dong GUO Hong-qian(Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China)
出处 《现代泌尿外科杂志》 CAS 2017年第6期429-432,共4页 Journal of Modern Urology
关键词 前列腺癌根治术 穿刺活检 GLEASON评分 升级 radical prostatectomy needle biopsy Gleason score upgrading
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1JEMAJ A,BRAY F,CENTER MM,et al.Global cancer statistics[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2):69-90.
  • 2DAVIES JD,AGHAZADEH MA, PHILLIPS S,et al.Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason Gcore upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer[J]. J Urol, 2011,186(6):2221-2227.
  • 3EROGLU M, DOLUOGLU OG, SARICI H, et al.Does the time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy affect Gleason Score upgrading in patients with clinical T1c prostate cancer? [J].Korean J Urol,2014,55.(6):395-399.
  • 4SARICI H, TELLI O, YIGITBASI O, et al.Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in patients with prostate biopsy Gleason score ≤6[J]. Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8(5-6):E342-346.
  • 5CORCORAN NM,HONG MK,CASEY RG,et al.Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence[J].BJU Int,2011,108(8 Pt 2):E202-E210.
  • 6RICHSTONE L, BIANCO FJ, SHAH HH, et al. Radical prostatectomy in men aged>or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram [J]. BJU Int,2008,101:541-546.
  • 7BRIGHT E, MANUEL C, GODDARD JC, et al. Incidence and variables predicting Gleason score up-grading between trans-rectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy [J]. Urol Int,2010,84:180-184.
  • 8GERSHMAN B, DAHL DM, OLUMI AF, et al. Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading[J]. Urol Oncol,2013,31:1033-1037.
  • 9EPSTEIN JI, FENG Z, TROCK BJ,et al.Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy:incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades[J].Eur Urol,2012,61(5):1019-1024.
  • 10PELTOLAEL M,NIEMELA P,VAISANEN V,et al.Intacted internally cleaved free prostate-specific antigen in patent with prostate cancer with different pathologic stages and grades [J].Urology,2011,77(4):1009,1-8.

共引文献5

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部