汉帝国嗣君之争与春秋史的书写

A Writing of the Chunqiu History under the Background of Struggling for Crown Prince in Han Empire

"过去的历史之争即现实的权威之争",为强化集体认同,提供现实合理性、正当性,历史往往存在着一个记忆、恢复与创造的书写过程。汉初继嗣不明,嗣君之争给帝国所造成的威胁与祸患深刻地影响了春秋史书写,而春秋史书写也反过来影响了帝国政治。由于所处中央和王国视阈的不同,在嗣君问题上,《公羊》主张"择权在君"原则,《左传》主张"太子优先性"原则,而《榖梁》兴起于民间,受民间亲缘伦理和武帝末年"巫蛊之祸"影响,强调嗣君的"天伦"秩序,深刻影响了社会变革,下开魏晋六朝贵族社会之局。

＂Warring authorities mean warring pasts＂. In order to strengthen the collective identity and provide realistic ra-tionality and legitimacy, history often exists a writing process which is a memory, recovery and invention. In the early days ofthe Han Dynasty, It caused profound influence on the history writing of the Spring and Autumn Period that struggling for thecrown prince brought threat and scourge to Han empire. And the writing of the Spring and Autumn history in turn affected theimperial politics. Because of the difference between the central and the kingdom, the ＂Gongyang＂ advocated the prin-ciple of ＂the king~ s selectivity＂ and ＂Zuozhuan＂ advocated the principle of ＂prince＇ s priority＂, and ＂Guliang＂ rised in the folk, deeply affected by folk kinship and the Case of witchcraft＂ in the last year of Wu emperor. It emphasizesa ＂Tianlun＂ order in the crown prince＇ s establishing and Confucian system, which profoundly affected the socialchange, opened the Wei and Jin dynasties aristocratic society.