摘要
"过去的历史之争即现实的权威之争",为强化集体认同,提供现实合理性、正当性,历史往往存在着一个记忆、恢复与创造的书写过程。汉初继嗣不明,嗣君之争给帝国所造成的威胁与祸患深刻地影响了春秋史书写,而春秋史书写也反过来影响了帝国政治。由于所处中央和王国视阈的不同,在嗣君问题上,《公羊》主张"择权在君"原则,《左传》主张"太子优先性"原则,而《榖梁》兴起于民间,受民间亲缘伦理和武帝末年"巫蛊之祸"影响,强调嗣君的"天伦"秩序,深刻影响了社会变革,下开魏晋六朝贵族社会之局。
"Warring authorities mean warring pasts". In order to strengthen the collective identity and provide realistic ra-tionality and legitimacy, history often exists a writing process which is a memory, recovery and invention. In the early days ofthe Han Dynasty, It caused profound influence on the history writing of the Spring and Autumn Period that struggling for thecrown prince brought threat and scourge to Han empire. And the writing of the Spring and Autumn history in turn affected theimperial politics. Because of the difference between the central and the kingdom, the "Gongyang" advocated the prin-ciple of "the king~ s selectivity" and "Zuozhuan" advocated the principle of "prince' s priority", and "Guliang" rised in the folk, deeply affected by folk kinship and the Case of witchcraft" in the last year of Wu emperor. It emphasizesa "Tianlun" order in the crown prince' s establishing and Confucian system, which profoundly affected the socialchange, opened the Wei and Jin dynasties aristocratic society.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期41-53,共13页
Qilu Journal
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"<摩西五经>与<周礼>的跨文本比较研究"(12BZJ018)
江苏省"青蓝工程"
南京大学人文基金资助项目
关键词
汉帝国
嗣君之争
春秋三传
继嗣原则
历史书写
Han Empire
the struggling for Crown Prince
Three Works of Chunqiu
the principle of Crown Prince
histo-ry writing