摘要
判例、案例与指导性案例既具有一定程度的相似性,也具有相当的异质性。在目前中国司法语境下,指导性案例的称谓具有折衷性;刑事指导性案例的裁判要旨与刑法规范承载的规则内涵的关系实质是指导性案例裁判规则与刑法规范的关系,二者具有内在一致性;指导性案例颠覆了传统司法解释的抽象性。长久来看,通过刑事指导性案例产生的规则来约束和指导法官办理同类或者类似案件,刑事司法解释功能将逐渐淡化。
The judicial precedent, the case and the guiding case have a certain degree of similarity, but also a considerable heter-ogeneity. In the current judicial context in China, the title of the guiding case has a compromise. The relationship between the judg-ment gist of criminal guiding case and the connotation of rules embodied in criminal law is the relationship between the judgment rules of the guiding case and the norm of criminal law. They are inherently consistent. The guiding case subverts the abstraction of traditional judicial interpretation. In the long run, the rules produced by criminal guiding cases will constrain and guide judges in handling similar cases, and the function of criminal judicial interpretation will gradually fade.
出处
《华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版)》
2017年第3期94-99,共6页
Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)
基金
2015年度重庆市社科规划项目"刑事指导性案例生成机制研究--以重庆市指导性案例生成实践为样本"(2015QNFX30)
关键词
指导性案例
刑法规范
司法解释
guiding case
norm of criminal law
judicial interpretation