期刊文献+

《史记》法家人物与酷吏之异同剖析

A Brief Analysis of the Legalists and the Oppressive Officials in Historical Records
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于《史记》中对于法家人物与酷吏的性格特征描述的极为相似,使人们对法家人物与酷吏之间的人物特征产生了一定程度的混淆。文章通过具体地分析和探讨了司马迁在评价法家人物及酷吏时所表现出来的感性和理性矛盾,并进一步剖析了法家人物与酷吏各自所具有的特征,揭示了法家人物与酷吏之间的联系与区别。 Because of the similar description of the characters of the legalists and the oppressive officials in Historical Records, the characters of the legalists and the oppressive officials are often confusing. This paper analyzes and discusses the emotional and ra-tional contradiction of Sima Qian reflected in the evaluation of the legalists and the oppressive officials. Further the paper analyzes the characteristics of legalists and the oppressive officials, to reveal the differences between the legalists and the oppressive officials.
作者 张钧涛
出处 《渭南师范学院学报》 2017年第13期55-59,共5页 Journal of Weinan Normal University
关键词 司马迁 《史记》 法治 法家人物 酷吏 Sima Qian Historical Records rule by law legalists oppressive officials
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1武树臣.循吏、酷吏与汉代法律文化[J].中外法学,1993,5(5):24-29. 被引量:7
  • 2《商君书·开塞》,河南人民出版社,1974年.
  • 3《管子·法法》,台北商务印书馆1988年版,第297页.
  • 4.《商君书·算地》[M].,..
  • 5.《商君书·赏刑》[M].,..
  • 6.《管子·禁藏》[M].,..
  • 7.《管子·桓公问》[M].,..
  • 8.《慎子·威德》[M].,..
  • 9.《慎子·德立》[M].,..
  • 10.《慎子·知忠》[M].,..

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部