期刊文献+

基于F-AHP法的隧道突涌水风险等级评价 被引量:13

Risk grade evaluation of tunnel water inrush based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了防治隧道突涌水灾害,基于模糊层次分析法,以云山隧道为例,建立隧道突涌水风险等级指标递阶层次结构模型,确定其突涌水风险等级。研究结果表明:裂隙水、超前地质预报和监控量测是控制云山隧道发生突涌水风险的主要因素;确定云山隧道突涌水风险发生概率等级为4级,云山隧道突涌水风险损失等级为3级,云山隧道突涌水风险等级为Ⅲ级。基于模糊层次分析法的云山隧道突涌水风险等级评价结果与设计阶段安全风险评估报告相一致,表明运用该方法进行隧道突涌水风险等级确定具有一定的合理性和科学性,为今后类似工程提供参考和借鉴。 In order to control sudden water inflow disasters of tunnel, based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchyprocess and taking Yunshan tunnel as an example, hierarchical structure model was based on established toevaluate risk grade in tunnel sudden water inflow. The results show that the central factors controlling suddenwater inflow in Yunshan tunnel are crack water, advance geological forecast and monitoring measurement. Therisk grade of possible dangerous will take place is 4th level, the loss seriousness is 3th level and the risk rating ofYunshan tunnel sudden water inflow is 3th level. The evaluation results for the risk level of Yunshan tunnelsudden water inflow on the basis of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process is consistent with the design stage securityrisk assessment report, which illustrates that this method has a certain rationality and science, and it can providereference to the similar engineering in the future.
出处 《铁道科学与工程学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期1334-1341,共8页 Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51378071) 黄土地区公路建设与养护技术交通行业重点实验室和山西省重点实验室开放课题(KLTLR-Y13-19) 大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201610704129)
关键词 公路隧道 突涌水 F-AHP(模糊层次分析法) 风险等级评价 highway tunnel water inrush F-AHP (fuzzy analytic hierarchy process) risk grade evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献109

共引文献412

同被引文献114

引证文献13

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部