期刊文献+

Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer:a randomized controlled trial 被引量:6

Weekly taxane-anthracycline combination regimen versus tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer:a randomized controlled trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Background:Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer.However,few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer.This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxaneanthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.Methods:Patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide(FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel-epirubicin(PE) regimen.The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response(pCR) rate.Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response,breast-conserving surgery rate,and adverse events.Results:Between March 2010 and September 2013,293 patients were randomized to the FEC(n=151) and PE(n=142) arms.The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(76.06%vs.59.95%,P=0.001).Consistently,the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(P<0.001).However,the pCR rate was similar in the two arms(10.61%vs.12.31%,P=0.665).Overall,36(27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6(35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery.Most adverse events were comparable in both arms,with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(11.97%vs.5.96%,P=0.031).Conclusions:In patients with locally advanced breast cancer,weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR.However,weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects.On this account,the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer.Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer.Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry,ChiCTR-TRC-10001043,September 21。 Background:Extensive studies have confirmed the efficacy of taxanes in combination with anthracycline-based chemotherapy on breast cancer.However,few studies have assessed the efficacy of weekly taxane-anthracycline regimens on locally advanced breast cancer.This study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a weekly taxaneanthracycline regimen with those of tri-weekly anthracycline-based regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.Methods:Patients with locally advanced breast cancer were randomized to receive 4-6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tri-weekly 5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide(FEC) regimen or weekly paclitaxel-epirubicin(PE) regimen.The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response(pCR) rate.Other endpoints included the clinical tumor response,breast-conserving surgery rate,and adverse events.Results:Between March 2010 and September 2013,293 patients were randomized to the FEC(n=151) and PE(n=142) arms.The overall clinical response rate was significantly higher in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(76.06%vs.59.95%,P=0.001).Consistently,the post-chemotherapy pathologic T and N stages were significantly lower in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(P〈0.001).However,the pCR rate was similar in the two arms(10.61%vs.12.31%,P=0.665).Overall,36(27.27%) patients in the FEC arm and 6(35.28%) in the PE arm were qualified for breast-conserving surgery.Most adverse events were comparable in both arms,with more severe neutropenia in the PE arm than in the FEC arm(11.97%vs.5.96%,P=0.031).Conclusions:In patients with locally advanced breast cancer,weekly PE was not superior to FEC in terms of pCR.However,weekly PE has a higher response rate and superior down-staging effects.On this account,the PE regimen may be considered an alternative option for locally advanced breast cancer.Long-term follow-up data are needed to confirm the efficacy of this regimen on locally advanced breast cancer.Trial registration Chinese clinical trial registry,ChiCTR-TRC-10001043,September 21,2014
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2017年第6期274-281,共8页
基金 Financial support for the tumour response surveillance portion of this prospective randomized trial was provided by Pfizer(WS388465) Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province(2014SZ0190)
关键词 随机对照试验 治疗方案 乳腺癌 紫杉烷 晚期 环类 药物 Locally advanced breast cancer, Neoadjuvant, Randomized clinical trial, Taxanes, Anthracycline, Chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1Rosen PP. Breast Pathology. Philadephia: Lippincott-Raven publishers, 1960.
  • 2Willis RA. Pathology of Tumours. 3rd edition. London: Butterworths, 1960.
  • 3Spencer WG. Translation of De Medicina by A.C. Celsus, Loeb Classical library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938.
  • 4Ling Y, Zhou QZ, Situ HL Study on therapy of breast cancer by Chinese traditional medicine. Li SL, ed. Human Breast Tumor. Beijing: Scientific and Technical Documentation Press, 2000: 537- 849.
  • 5Emilio Alba,Manuel Ruiz-Borrego,Mireia Margelí,álvaro Rodríguez-Lescure,Pedro Sánchez-Rovira,Amparo Ruiz,Jose Ramón Mel-Lorenzo,Manuel Ramos-Vázquez,Nuria Ribelles,Elisa Calvo,Antonio Casado,Antonia Márquez,David Vicente,José Angel García-Sáenz,Miguel Martín.Maintenance treatment with Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus observation following induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM 2001-01 study[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2010(1)
  • 6P. Fumoleau,R. Largillier,C. Clippe,V. Dièras,H. Orfeuvre,T. Lesimple,S. Culine,B. Audhuy,D. Serin,H. Curé,E. Vuillemin,J.-F. Morère,F. Montestruc,Z. Mouri,M. Namer.Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer[J].European Journal of Cancer.2003(4)
  • 7Gennari Alessandra,Stockler Martin,Puntoni Matteo,Sormani Mariapia,Nanni Oriana,Amadori Dino,Wilcken Nicholas,D’Amico Mauro,DeCensi Andrea,Bruzzi Paolo.Duration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology . 2011
  • 8Henderson IC,Berry DA,Demetri GD,et al.Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2003
  • 9R.K. Gregory,T.J. Powles,J.C. Chang,S. Ashley.??A randomised trial of six versus twelve courses of chemotherapy in metastatic carcinoma of the breast(J)European Journal of Cancer . 1997 (13)
  • 10O. Kloke,U. Klaassen,C. Oberhoff,G. Hartwich,J. Szanto,E. Wolf,M. Heckmann,R. Huhn,L. Stephan,U. Schnepper,G.‐M. Donsbach,C. Bechtel,R. Rudolph,A. Berke,D. Borquez,I.rtwich Hawig,H. Hirche,A.E. Schindler,S. Seeber,R. Becher.??Maintenance treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with advanced breast cancer responding to chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial(J)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . 1999 (1)

共引文献120

同被引文献24

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部