期刊文献+

高等教育办学成本持续增加的组织制度分析 被引量:9

The Analysis of the Increasing Operation Cost of Higher Education from the Perspective of Organizational Institution
原文传递
导出
摘要 高等教育办学成本与办学经费的持续增长是高等教育的组织特性与需求,是由高等学校的声誉机制、制度型组织与人力资源密集型的组织特性所决定的。要随着高等教育办学规模的增长和质量的需求不断提高办学经费,高等学校的开支应主要用于教师,可以通过绩效评估等方法提高高校的办学效益,控制成本的过度上涨。 The continued growth in operational cost and educational funding is the institutional characteristics and the demand of higher education, Which depends on the reputation mechanism of university, institutional organization and the organizational characteristics of intensive human resource. Along with the enlarged scale of higher education and the demand for higher quality, the educational founding should be increased, and the expenditure should be mainly used for faculties. The university can implement the cost control and improve operating efficiency through methods such as performance evaluation.
作者 李立国
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第7期37-42,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)"现代大学组织变革与转型研究"的研究成果
关键词 办学成本 持续增长 人力资源密集型组织 声誉组织 制度型组织 The continued growth in operational cost Human resource-intensive organization reputational organization institutional organization
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献70

  • 1李立国,刘向兵.比较优势、竞争优势与中国研究型大学跨越式发展研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2005,26(1):58-63. 被引量:4
  • 2Sitalakshmi Venkatraman. A Framework for Implementing TQM in Higher Education Programs. Quality Assurance in Education,vol.15,No,1.2007:96, 98, 99, 99, 97.
  • 3James M.Ritter. The Applicability of Total Quality Management to Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Percertions of Community College Chief Academic Officers and Chief Financial Officers. Kent State University (Doctoral Dissertation),2005:63, 3, 4.
  • 4Jann E.Freed and Marie R.Klugman. Quality Principles and Practices in Higher Education. American Council on Education and The Oryx Press,1997.220.
  • 5Mohammad S. Owlia and Elaine M. Aspinwall. TQM in Higher Edueation-A Review. International Journal of Quality& Reliability Management,Vol. 14 No. 5, 1997:534-537, 537, 531,531,531.
  • 6G. Srikanthan & John F. Dalrymple. Developing a Holistlc Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2002:215, 215.
  • 7Marilyn M.Helms and Ashley B.Williams and Judy C. Nixon. TQM Principles and Their Relevance to Higher Educaiton:The Question of Tenure and Post-Tenure Review. The International Journal of Educational Management 15/7,2001. 326, 326.
  • 8Hakan wiklund,Bengt KlefsjSPia Sandvik Wiklund and Bo Edvardsson. Innovation and TQM in Swedish Higher Education Institutions-Possibilities and Pitfalls. The TQM Magazine.volume 15,number 2,2003:99.
  • 9Gavriel Meirovich and Edward J. Romar. The Difllcuhy in Implementing TQM in Higher Education Instruction. Quality Assurance in Education. vol.14,No,4,2006: 325, 325.
  • 10Diana Green .What is Quality in Higher Education .Society for Research into Higher Education& Open University Press, 1994:12.

共引文献88

同被引文献91

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部