摘要
孟荀哲学对于欲望的看法,大体都是采取限制的态度。但从劳思光强调的主体性概念而划分的自我层次标准看,孟荀欲观的理论依据,其性善论强调自我的超越性道德意识层面,其性恶论强调自我的动物性的层面。从主体发用之境域标准看,欲观工夫论又都只是承认单一主体境域的修养方案,而无多主体并立领域之欲望解决方案,从理论功能标准看,此种理论得失值得我们现代社会文化建设借鉴和反思。
Meneius and Xunzi on the desire of the views are taken to limit the attitude. But Mencius's iedas about human essence emphasizes the transcendent moral aspect , and Xunzi's idea about human nature emphasizes human's natural aspect according to Mr. LaoSiguang's concept of Subjectivity. On the other hand, Meneius and Xunzi's methodologies only recognize a single subject according to the main body of the activity. It inspire us to think our cultural.
出处
《湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2017年第4期1-6,共6页
Journal of Hubei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
孟子
荀子
欲观
主体性
Mencius
Xunzi
desire
subjectivity