期刊文献+

慢性心力衰竭合并肾损害患者血清白细胞介素1、白细胞介素6水平的变化及临床意义 被引量:27

Serum levels of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in patients with chronic heart failure accompanied with renal damage and its clinical significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨慢性心力衰竭合并肾损害患者血清白细胞介素1(IL-1)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)水平的变化及其临床意义。方法选取纽约心脏病学会(NYHA)心功能分级在Ⅱ~Ⅳ级的慢性心力衰竭患者220例,测定其血清尿素氮(BUN)、血肌酐(SCr)、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-pro BNP)及IL-1、IL-6水平,计算肾小球滤过率(e GFR),随机尿检测尿微量白蛋白(MAU),心脏超声测定左室射血分数(LVEF),比较不同心功能患者的IL-1、IL-6、NT-pro BNP、e GFR和MAU,不同肾功能患者的IL-1、IL-6,分析IL-1、IL-6与NYHA心功能分级、NT-pro BNP、LVEF、e GFR及MAU的关系。结果与NYHAⅡ级心功能患者相比,NYHAⅢ~Ⅳ级心功能患者血清IL-1、IL-6、NT-pro BNP水平及MAU升高,e GFR降低(P<0.05),NYHAⅣ级心功能患者IL-1、IL-6、NT-pro BNP水平及MAU高于NYHAⅢ级(P<0.05)。NYHAⅢ~Ⅳ级心功能患者中,30%≤EF≤50%患者血清IL-1、IL-6、NT-pro BNP水平及MAU高于EF>50%患者(P<0.05),e GFR低于EF>50%患者(P<0.05),EF<30%患者IL-1、IL-6、NT-pro BNP水平及MAU高于30%≤EF≤50%患者(P<0.05)。NYHAⅢ~Ⅳ级心功能患者中,肾功能不全组[e GFR<60 m L/(min·1.73 m2)]血清IL-1、IL-6水平高于肾功能正常组[e GFR≥60 m L/(min·1.73 m2)](P<0.05)。不同基础疾病的心力衰竭患者之间IL-1、IL-6水平及e GFR比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血清IL-1、IL-6水平与NYHA心功能分级、NT-pro BNP及MAU呈正相关(P<0.05),与e GFR、LVEF呈负相关(P<0.05)。结论慢性心力衰竭患者血清炎症因子IL-1、IL-6水平升高,与心力衰竭的严重程度和肾功能受损相关,测定血清IL-1、IL-6水平可能有助于临床心衰病情的评估。 Aim To explore the serum levels of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in patients with chronic heart failure accompanied with renal damage and its clinical significance. Methods 220 New York Heart As-sociation (NYHA) functional class Ⅱ-Ⅳ patients with chronic heart failure were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of blood urea nitrogen ( BUN), serum creatinine ( SCr), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ( NT-proBNP), IL- 1 and IL-6 were detected, microalbuminuria (MAU) was detected randomly, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was meas-ured by echocardiography, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. The levels of IL-1, IL-6, NT-proBNP, MAU and eGFR in different cardiac function groups were compared and the levels of IL-1 and IL-6 in different renal func- tion groups were compared. The relationship between IL-1, IL-6 and NYHA functional classification, NT-proBNP, LVEF, eGFR and MAU were analysed. Results The serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, NT-proBNP and MAU in NYHA Ⅲ -Ⅳ groups were higher than NYHA Ⅱ group (P〈0.05), the eGFR of NYHA Ⅲ -Ⅳ groups were lower than NYHA Ⅱ group (P〈0.05), and the levels of IL-1, IL-6, NT-proBNP and MAU in NYHA Ⅳ group were higher than NYHA Ⅲ group (P〈 0.05). In NYHA functional class Ⅲ -Ⅳ patients the serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, NT-proBNP and MAU in 30%≤EF≤50% group were higher than EF〉50%group (P〈0.05), the eGFR of 30% ≤EF≤50% group were lower than EF〉50% group (P〈0. 05), the serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, NT-proBNP and MAU in EF〈30% group were higher than 30% ≤EF≤50% group (P〈0.05). In NYHA functional class Ⅲ -Ⅳ patients the serum levels of IL-1, IL-6 in renal dysfunction group [ eGFR〈60 mL/( min. 1.73m^2 ) ] were higher than normal renal function group [ eGFR≥ 60 mL/( min. 1.73m^2 ) ] ( P〈 0. 05). The serum levels of IL-1, IL-6 and eGFR had no obvious difference in different basic etiologies groups (P〉0. 05). The serum levels of IL-1 and IL-6 were positively correlated with the NYHA functional classification, MAU and NT-proBNP (P〈0. 05), negatively correlated with LVEF and eGFR (P〈0.05). Conclusion The serum levels of IL-1 and IL-6 are elevated in patients with chronic heart failure and correlated with the severity of chronic heart failure and renal damage, and detecting IL-1, IL-6 may provide some assistances for assessing the severity of heart failure in clinical.
出处 《中国动脉硬化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第7期710-714,共5页 Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis
关键词 慢性心力衰竭 白细胞介素1 白细胞介素6 肾功能 Chronic heart failure Interleukin-1 Interleukin-6 Renal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献117

  • 1昌薇,王祥贵,雷健.同型半胱氨酸对人血管平滑肌细胞基质金属蛋白酶-9和基质金属蛋白酶抑制物-1表达的影响[J].中国心血管病研究,2005,3(12):927-929. 被引量:10
  • 2戴自英.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999..
  • 3Ross R. Atherosclerosis-an inflammation disease [ J ]. New Engl J Med, 1999, 340 (2) : 115-126.
  • 4Shishehbor MH, Hazen SL. Inflammatory and oxidative markers in atherosclerosis: relationship to outcome [ J ]. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2004, 6 (3) : 243-250.
  • 5Stocker R, Keaney JF JR. Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis [J]. Phsiol Rev, 2003, 84:1 381-478.
  • 6Altman R. Risk factor in coronary atherosclerosis inflammation: the meet- ing point [J]. Thromb J, 2003, 1 (4) : 1-11.
  • 7Cefieno A, Motz E. Is oxidative stress the pathogenic mechanism underlying insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease? The common soll hypothesis revisited [J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2004, 24: 816-823.
  • 8Yokoyama M. Oxidant stress and atherosclerosis [ J ]. Current Opin Pharmacol, 2004, 4: 110-119.
  • 9Taniyama Y, Griendling KK. Reactive oxygen species in the vasculature molecular and cellular mechanisms [ J ]. Hypertension, 2003, 42 : 1 075 - 081.
  • 10Heerebeek LV, Meischi C, Stooker W, et al. NADPH oxidasea(s) : New source(s) of reactive oxygen species in the vascular system [J] ? J Clin Pathol, 2002, 55: 561-568.

共引文献4993

同被引文献283

引证文献27

二级引证文献255

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部