期刊文献+

技术经济范式变化对国家创新体系的影响和启示 被引量:7

The Impact of Technological and Economic Paradigm Change on National Innovation System and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着新科技革命和产业变革的酝酿,技术经济范式发生着深刻的变化,体现在:作为关键生产要素的新兴技术呈现群发性和融合性特征,需要更加稳定、包容的公共研发平台;全球产业分工的结构性变化将导致企业竞争压力明显增加,需要由核心企业主导的更加敏捷、低成本的创新网络;创新资源配置主体和方式多元化,需要更加多元、协同的创新治理结构;个性化定制需求逐渐旺盛,需要更加前瞻、深刻的用户参与;传统的劳动力成本优势将逐步减弱,需要更开放、宽松的人才"红利"释放机制。在新的技术经济范式建立完善过程中,也必然需要新的政策设计完善国家创新体系,这体现在适应创新主体变化、夯实基本创新制度、强化创新链后端政策、关注技术制度互动等方面。 The full understanding on the technical and economic paradigm is one of the basic factors to improve the national innovation system and to design STI policies. With the new technological and industrial revolution brewing, technological and economic paradigms changes profoundly. For example, as the key elements of production, emerging technologies are mass and the integrated, which need more stable and inclusive public R&D platform; the global industrial structure changes need more low cost innovation networks; diver- sification of the innovation entities and the way for innovation resources allocation need more pluralistic and collaborative governance structure. With the evolution of new technical and economic paradigm, it needs to design new policies to improve the national innovation system, such as the adaptation of innovation entities changes, reinforcement on law and basic institutions, focus on demand side poli- cies, paying attention to the interaction between new technologies and institutions.
作者 李哲
出处 《中国科技论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第7期28-32,共5页 Forum on Science and Technology in China
基金 国家科技部战略研究专项"科技创新政策理论与方法研究"(115041) "三螺旋创新理论研究"(115039)
关键词 技术经济范式 国家创新体系 科技创新政策 Technical and economic paradigm National innovation system STI policy
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献47

  • 1王怀宁.美国“新经济”新在何处[J].瞭望,2000(16):8-9. 被引量:3
  • 2Levitt B , March J G. Organizational learning [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1988, (14) : 319 -340.
  • 3Arthur W B. Competing technologies, increasing return and lock-in by historical evens [J]. Economic Journal ,1989, (99) :116 - 131.
  • 4Teece D, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997(18) : 509 -533.
  • 5Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, ( 35 ) : 128 - 152.
  • 6Matusik S, Hill C W L. The utilization of contingent work, knowledge creation and competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998 (23) : 680- 697.
  • 7Stephen Tallman, Mark Jenkins, Nick Henry, Steven Pinch. Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2004, 29(2) :258 -271.
  • 8Henderson R, Clark K B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990(35): 1-30.
  • 9Zahra S A, George G. Absorptive capacity: A review,reconceptualization, and extension [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2002 ( 27 ) : 185 - 203.
  • 10雷蒙德·迈尔斯,格兰特·迈尔斯,查理斯·诺斯.有利于行动:关于各种可选择组织形式价值的综合理论[A].战略柔性[C],2000,103—126.

共引文献50

同被引文献228

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部