摘要
清人毛德琦提出朱熹任浙东提举时"遗钱三十万,属军守钱闻诗"建白鹿洞书院礼圣殿后,后人多引用之,几被视为定论,甚至有人认为此钱乃属宋廷用于赈济浙江灾荒的"赈粜款",而被朱熹所挪用。据相关史料,从史料来源、宋代制度、朱熹自记浙东赈济事实等方面来看,此说显非史实,乃属后人不明宋代制度、加上误读史料而致误。
MAO Deqi, a man of the Qing dynasty, once said that ZHU Xi "left 300,000 liang silver and ordered Chief QIAN Wenshi" to build a ritual palace of Bailudong Academy after he was appointed Tiju of East Zhejiang. This state-ment was cited many times later, and was almost regarded as the final conclusion. Even someone thought this sum of money was given by the Song Court originally for the famine relief supply of Zhejiang province, but later was diverted by ZHU Xi. According to relevant historical materials, in the aspect of material origin, system of the Song dynasty, ZHU Xi's recording of the relief supply of East Zhejiang, we could and conclude that it is not true, but mistaken be-cause of the misunderstanding of the system of the Song dynasty, and the misreading of historical materials.
出处
《上饶师范学院学报》
2017年第2期1-4,共4页
Journal of Shangrao Normal University
关键词
朱熹
白鹿洞书院
礼圣殿
赈粜款
ZHU Xi
ritual palace
Bailudong Academy
money for relief supply