票据无权代理与票据伪造之异同点比较研究

A Comparative Study between Unauthorized Agency of Bills and Bills Forgery

比较票据无权代理与票据伪造就能发现这两者之间具有形式上的差异却又有实质上的一致,故对其存在的异同点,尤以构成要件、追认的可否、责任内容三个角度进行彻底检证、全面比较,兼具理论和实践双重意义。在完成上述三项对比研究的基础上,最后通过中日票据理论比较方法、以理论创新的视角尝试在票据无权代理的法律制度上寻找票据伪造人承担票据责任的突破口。

A comparative study between unauthorized agency of bills and bills forgery can make us know that they are different in form but the same in essence. Therefore, a thorough study of the differences between them from the perspectives of constitutive requirements, possibility of ratification, content of liability is of theoretical and practical significance. Based on the comparison, this paper tries to find out breakthroughs of letting bill forgers un- dertake the liability from law by comparing Chinese bill theory and Japanese bill theory and from the perspective of theoretical innovation.