法庭言辞入罪评析——兼论《刑法修正案(九)》第三十七条第三款之适用

Comment on the Words crime of the court——On the Application of Paragraph 3 of Article 37 of the Criminal Law Amendment(9)

法庭言论入刑固然有其必要性,但也不是毫无逻辑和底线。"明显而即刻危险原则""真实性抗辩原则""公共利益原则"等,英美国家精心设计的致力最大限度保障言论自由的方案,为厘清法庭言论的刑法边界提供了有益借鉴。划分刑民边界,明晰要件要素,扩展阻却事由,保护善意言论;高配入罪门槛,区分善意和恶意、公益和私利,等等,在审慎扩权的同时严格限权,是新条款施行平行不悖的两条进路。

It is of course necessary for the court to enter into prison, but it is not without logic and the bot- tom line. The principle of ＂ the principle of truth＂ and the principle of ＂ public interest＂ and so on. The plan designed by the Anglo - American countries to ensure the maximum freedom of speech is a useful reference for clarifying the criminal law boundary of the court＇s speech. The distinction between goodwill and malice, public welfare and self - interest, and so on, in the prudent expansion of the right at the same time strict restrictions on the implementation of the provisions of the new clause is not parallel to the provisions of the crime, Contrary to the two approach.