期刊文献+

高频超声引导或解剖定位下区域阻滞在髌骨手术麻醉中的应用效果比较 被引量:6

Comparative application effect of high frequency ultrasound guided or under the anatomical position of regional block in patellar anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价高频超声引导或解剖定位下股神经阻滞在髌骨手术麻醉的应用效果。方法:选取80例择期行髌骨手术患者,随机分为对照组(D组)和观察组(E组)(n=40)。对照组患者采取传统解剖定位穿刺下行股神经阻滞麻醉,观察组患者采取高频超声引导下行股神经阻滞麻醉。分析两组患者一般情况,麻醉完成时间、麻醉阻滞起效时间、不良反应及并发症的发生情况。结果:观察组患者麻醉完成时间与对照组相比无统计学意义(P>0.05);而阻滞起效时间、镇痛持续时间(VAS评分)、不良反应与并发症发生均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:高频超声引导下股神经阻滞麻醉较传统解剖定位阻滞麻醉安全性高,定位更准确、持续时间更长、麻醉起效更快、术后并发症发生少,比传统阻滞方法阻滞效果更安全更舒适。 Objective:To evaluate the application effect of high frequency ultrasound guided or under the anatomical position of regional block in patellar anesthesia.Methods:Eighty cases undergoing elective patellar surgery were selected and randomly divided into control group(group D)and observation group(group E)(n = 40).Patients in group D received traditional anatomical sciaticfemoral nerve block anesthesia,and those in group E received high-frequency ultrasound guiding femoral nerve block anesthesia.The anesthesia time,anesthetic effect time,adverse reaction and complications of two groups of patients were analyzed.Results:Compared with the control group,there was no statistical significance in anesthesia completion time of observation group(P〈0.05).However,the block beginning time,duration of analgesia(VAS score),adverse reaction and complications of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion:High frequency ultrasound guided percutaneous femoral nerve block anesthesia than traditional anatomical positioning block anesthesia high safety,more accurate positioning,longer lasting,anesthesia work faster and less postoperative complications.
作者 曾繁硕 Zeng Fan-shuo(Department of Anesthesia, The People's Hospital of Tongbai, Henan Nanyang 47475)
出处 《四川生理科学杂志》 2017年第2期73-74,共2页 Sichuan Journal of Physiological Sciences
关键词 高频超声引导 区域阻滞 股神经阻滞 髌骨术 High frequency ultrasound guided Regional block Femoral nerve block Patellar operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1邓笔生.股神经阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉在髌骨骨折中的应用比较[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(9):490-490. 被引量:3
  • 2顾华华,车薛华,李佩盈,梁伟民.刺激电流大小对上肢肘以下外科手术患者锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞成功率的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(21):1470-1473. 被引量:11
  • 3李佩盈,车薛华,顾华华,梁伟民.定位臂丛神经后束对锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞效果的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(29):2058-2061. 被引量:11
  • 4Niemi TT,Salmela L,Aromaa U. Single-injection brachial plexus anesthesia for arteriovenous fistula surgery of the forearm:a comparison of infraclavicular coracoid and axillary approach[J].Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine,2007,(01):55-59.
  • 5Rodrguez J,Taboada M,Oliveira J. Single stimulation of the posterior cord is superior to dual nerve stimulation in a coracoid block[J].Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2010,(02):241-245.
  • 6Mio Y,Fukuda N,Kusakari Y. Comparative effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on intracellular calcium transients and tension in ferret ventricular muscle[J].Anesthesiology,2004,(04):888-894.
  • 7Casati A,Santorsola R,Aldegheri G. Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery:a double-blind,randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine[J].Journal of Clinical Anesthesia,2003,(02):126.
  • 8Borgeat A,Blumenthal S,Lambert M. The feasibility and complication of the continuous popliteal nerve block:a 1001-case survey[J].Anesthesia and Analgesia,2006,(01):229-233.
  • 9Cruvinel MG,Castro CH,Silva YP. A comparative study on the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 20,30,or 40 mL of ropivacaine in posterior brachial plexus block[J].Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia,2007,(05):500-513.
  • 10Mageswaran R,Choy YC. Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine for infraclavicular brachial plexus block[J].Medical Journal of Malaysia,2010,(05):300-303.

共引文献32

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部