复杂罪过:交通肇事罪共犯的理论支撑

Complicated Culpability: Theoretical Support of Accomplice in Traffic Accident Crime

我国刑法总则规定,共同犯罪为共同故意犯罪。在刑法分则中,交通肇事罪的主观罪过为过失。最高人民法院的司法解释将指使者指使肇事者逃逸致人死亡的行为以共犯论处,从而与传统刑法理论和刑法的规定形成了冲突。解决这一冲突的途径在于犯罪的复杂罪过理论。共同犯罪的核心在于二人以上共同故意犯罪的过程,而非局限于所犯之罪是故意犯还是过失犯。在无需更改刑法条文和不引入其它颠覆性理论的前提下,复杂罪过理论可以为司法解释关于交通肇事罪共犯的"合法性"提供理论支撑。

China’s general provisions of criminal law stipulate that joint crime is joint intentional crime. In the specific provisions of the criminal law, the subjective crime of traffic accident crime is negligence. The judicial interpretation of the Supreme People Court provide the persons who instigate the troublemaker to run away and cause the death of the victim will be punished as an accomplice, thus the conflict with the traditional theories and the criminal law has taken shape. The solution to this conflict lies in the complicated culpability theory of crime. The core of the joint crime lies in the process of the joint intentional crime by more than two persons, rather than being limited in whether the crime is an intentional or negligent crime. On the premise of without changing the provisions of the criminal law and not introducing other subversive theories,the complicated culpability theory can provide theoretical support for the judicial interpretation of the legality of accomplice in traffic accident crime.