期刊文献+

大学英语校内测试有用性研究

A Study on the Usefulness of College English Testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测试和教学密切相关,大学英语校内测试的有用性对整个大学英语教学过程具有重要的影响。本文基于Bachman&Palmer提出的测试有用性框架,重点分析了大学英语校内测试的信度、构念效度、影响力以及可行性。结合理论分析和实践经验,揭示测试过程中潜在的问题,为更多高校语言测试的开发、实施和使用提供建议。 Testing and teaching are closely related to the usefulness of College English test has an important influence on the whole process of College English teaching. In this paper,the usefulness of Bachman & Palmer test framework based on the proposed focus on the analysis of the reliability of College English test,validity,feasibility and influence. According to the theoretical analysis and practical experience,to reveal the potential problems during testing,to develop more university language testing,provide recommendations for the implementation and use.
作者 周文明
出处 《教育教学论坛》 2017年第32期224-225,共2页 Education And Teaching Forum
关键词 大学英语 测试有用性 信度 构念效度 影响力 college English test usefulness reliability construct validity influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献71

  • 1AERA, APA & NCME. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 2APA, 1954. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques[J]. Psychological Bulletin Supplement 51: 1-38.
  • 3APA, AERA & NCME. 1966. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests andManuals [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 4Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford; OUP.
  • 5Bachman, L. 2003. Constructing an assessment use argument and supporting claims abouttest taker-assessment task interactions in evidence-centered assessment design [J].Measurement : Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 1 : 63-65.
  • 6Bachman, L. 2005. Building and supporting a case for test use [J]. Language AssessmentQuarterly 2: 1-34.
  • 7Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 8Bachman, L. &A. Palmer. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice : Developing LanguageAssessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World [M]. Oxford : OUP.
  • 9Bingham,W. 1937. Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing [M]. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • 10Briggs,D. 2004. Comment: Making an argument for design validity before interpretive va-lidity [J]. Measurement 2: 171-174.

共引文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部