期刊文献+

从16届世界地震工程大会看可恢复功能抗震结构研究趋势 被引量:65

Research trend of earthquake resilient structures seen from 16WCEE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 可恢复功能抗震结构是指地震后不需修复或者稍加修复就可恢复使用功能的结构,目前已成为地震工程领域一个新的研究方向,近年来受到了全球地震工程学者与工程技术人员的广泛关注。2017年1月在智利圣地亚哥召开的第16届世界地震工程大会的主题为"可恢复功能-土木工程的新挑战"。本文从摇摆及自复位结构、带可更换构件的结构两方面对本次世界地震工程大会展示的有关可恢复功能抗震结构的国际研究进展进行了总结。按照结构体系的不同,介绍了可恢复功能抗震结构在框架结构、剪力墙结构、框架-剪力墙结构、桥梁结构中的研究现状。大量的试验研究和数值模拟结果表明了可恢复功能结构优良的抗震性能。在此基础上,对该领域今后的研究方向进行了展望。 The earthquake resilient structure is the structure which can restore the structural function immediately after a severe earthquake without significant repair, which has been a new research direction in the field of earthquake engineering, which has attracted more and more attention by the related scholars and technologists. The 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering was held in Santiago, Chile in the January of 2017, whose theme was 'Resilience, the new challenge in earthquake engineering'. In this paper the research advances in the field of earthquake resilient structures shown by this conference are summarized, focusing on the rocking and self-centering structure and the structure with replaceable components. The research progress of the application of earthquake re- silient structures in moment frame structures, shear wall structures, frame-shear wall structures, bridge structures is introduced. The results of considerable experimental study and numerical analysis have verified good seismic performance of resilient structures. Based on the above reviewing results, the research orientation and prospect in the future are discussed finally.
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第3期1-9,共9页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51638012 51478354)~~
关键词 16届世界地震工程大会 可恢复功能抗震结构 研究进展 摇摆结构 自复位结构 可更换构件 16WCEE earthquake resilient structure research progress rocking structure self-centering structure replaceable member
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献64

  • 1FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 2FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 3FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 4Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 5Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 6Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 7Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.
  • 10Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the shortcomings of design guidelines [ R ]. Report No. PEER-01/07. Bekeley : University of California, Berkeley. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2001.

共引文献414

同被引文献507

引证文献65

二级引证文献395

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部