民国出版物中日军的暴行研究

Study on Japanese Atrocities in the Republican Publications

南京大屠杀之后，中国方面有无相关的出版物进行记载和报道？在日本右翼看来，当时的国民党和共产党的杂志、报纸和报告里都详细地讲述了战况和被害情况，但都没写存在南京大屠杀一事。这种简单的论断就成为他们眼中“南京大屠杀”不存在的有力“证据”。但事实是一直到战后，民国时期都有各种出版物刊载了南京保卫战、日军在南京的暴行以及公私财产损失等各方面情况，对于南京大屠杀有明确的记载，为我们深入研究留下了珍贵的史料。本文拟运用这些史料，分析研究民国出版物中的南京大屠杀，深化南京大屠杀研究。

After the Nanjing massacre, the Chinese side has no record and report of relevant publications？ In the Japanese right-wing view, the Kuomintang and the Communist Party＇s magazines, newspapers and reports were detailed in the battle and the situation, but did not write the existence of the Nanjing Massacre. This simple asser- tion becomes a powerful ＂evidence＂ that does not exist in the eyes of the Nanjing Massacre. But the fact is to the post-war period, the Republic of China has published a variety of publications published in Nanjing Battle, the Jap- anese in Nanjing atrocities and public and private property losses and other aspects of the Nanjing Massacre more clearly documented for our in-depth study Leaving a precious historical material. This article intends to use these historical materials, analysis of the Republic of China publications in the Holocaust, deepening the Nanjing massacre study.