《政治经济学批判大纲》视角下《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的“循环论证”问题

Circular Argument in the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 from the Perspective of Grundrisse

马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的"异化劳动与私有财产"一节最后部分,提出了关于异化劳动与私有财产何为最终根据的问题。这一问题又被学术界称之为"循环论证"问题。马克思在《政治经济学批判大纲》中通过历史叙事方式,解释了私有财产与异化劳动的起源及二者在现实化过程中的相互关系问题。从《大纲》中的历史叙事方式来看,《手稿》确乎陷入了循环论证。同时也可以说明,在唯物史观方面,《手稿》是一部不成熟的著作。

Marx puts forward the question which is the ultimate basis, alienated labor or private property in the last part of ＂alienated labor and private property＂ in Manuscripts 1844.This problem is known in academic circle as a ＂circular reasoning＂ .In Grundrisse Marx explains the origin of private property and alienated labor and the mutual relations between the two in the process of realization in a historical narrative way.From the perspective of historical narrative in Grundrisse , Manuscripts 1844 falls into a circular argument.At the same time, in terms of historical materialism, Manuscripts 1844 is an immature book,