摘要
Objective The influence of anti-tuberculosis （TB） treatment history on tuberculous lymphadenitis （TBLN） diagnosis is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic methods, including histology, microbiology, and molecular tests, used for TBLN. Methods In this study, suspected patients with TBLN and having different anti-T8 treatment background were enrolled. All the samples were tested simultaneously by histology, ZiehI-Neelsen （ZN） staining, mycobacterial culture （culture）, Xpert MTB/RIF （xpert）, real-time PCR, and high-resolution melting curve PCR （HRM）. Thereafter, the performance of these methods on samples with different anti-TB treatment background was assessed. Results In our study, 89 patients were prospectively included 82 patients with TBLN and 7 with other diseases. The overall sensitivities of Xpert, real-time PCR, histology, ZN staining, and culture were 86.6%, 69.5%, 58.5%, 43.9%, and 22.0%, respectively. The anti-TB treatment history revealed dramatic influences on the sensitivity of culture （P 〈 0.0001）. In fact, the treatment that lasted over 3 months also influenced the sensitivity of Xpert （P 〈 0.05）. However, the treatment history did not affect the performance of remaining tests （P 〉 0.05）. For rifampicin drug susceptibility test （DST）, the anti-T8 treatment showed only significant influence on the success rate of culture DST （P = 0.001）, but not on those of Xpert and HRM tests （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion Other tests as welt as culture should be considered for patients with TBLN having retreatment history or over 1-month treatment to avoid false negative results.
Objective The influence of anti-tuberculosis （TB） treatment history on tuberculous lymphadenitis （TBLN） diagnosis is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the diagnostic methods, including histology, microbiology, and molecular tests, used for TBLN. Methods In this study, suspected patients with TBLN and having different anti-T8 treatment background were enrolled. All the samples were tested simultaneously by histology, ZiehI-Neelsen （ZN） staining, mycobacterial culture （culture）, Xpert MTB/RIF （xpert）, real-time PCR, and high-resolution melting curve PCR （HRM）. Thereafter, the performance of these methods on samples with different anti-TB treatment background was assessed. Results In our study, 89 patients were prospectively included 82 patients with TBLN and 7 with other diseases. The overall sensitivities of Xpert, real-time PCR, histology, ZN staining, and culture were 86.6%, 69.5%, 58.5%, 43.9%, and 22.0%, respectively. The anti-TB treatment history revealed dramatic influences on the sensitivity of culture （P 〈 0.0001）. In fact, the treatment that lasted over 3 months also influenced the sensitivity of Xpert （P 〈 0.05）. However, the treatment history did not affect the performance of remaining tests （P 〉 0.05）. For rifampicin drug susceptibility test （DST）, the anti-T8 treatment showed only significant influence on the success rate of culture DST （P = 0.001）, but not on those of Xpert and HRM tests （P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion Other tests as welt as culture should be considered for patients with TBLN having retreatment history or over 1-month treatment to avoid false negative results.
基金
supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Number:81572077)
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special(Grant Number:XMLS201506,ZYLX201304)
Beijing Health System Training Program for High Level Technique Talents(Grant Number:2014-3-082)
the Capital Health Research and Development of Special(Grant Number:2014-4-2161)
Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’Ascent Plan(Grant Number:DFL20151501)
the Key Project of Department of Science and Technology Beijing,China(Grant Number:D141107005214003,D141107005214004)
