期刊文献+

真实盈余管理对审计费用的影响——来自中国A股上市公司的数据 被引量:7

Study on The Effect of Real Earnings Management on Audit Fees——Data From A-share Listed Companies in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 萨班斯法案(SOX)颁布后,上市公司逐渐放弃应计盈余管理方式,进而选择规避性更强的真实盈余管理行为。在我国资本市场,上市公司真实盈余管理行为是否会对审计收费产生影响?选取深沪A股上市公司2013年和2014年的数据,研究我国上市公司真实盈余管理对审计费用的影响,并在此基础上进一步对比研究国际"四大"和非国际"四大"会计师事务所的审计收费水平受到上市公司真实盈余管理具体影响程度的区别。实证结果表明:在控制其他影响因素的情况下,上市公司真实盈余管理显著影响审计费用且为正向影响;国际"四大"会计师事务所的审计收费比非国际"四大"会计师事务所受真实盈余管理影响的程度更大、更显著,"四大"对真实盈余管理的反应更敏感。研究成果丰富了真实盈余管理对审计费用影响的理论。 After the introduction of SOX,the listed companies gradually abandon accrual earnings management method,and choose the real earnings management method which is more evasive. In China's capital market,will the real earning management of listed companies have an impact on audit fees? Based on the data of Shenzhen and Shanghai A-share listed companies in 2013 and 2014,a study is conducted to analyze the impact of real earning management of listed companies on audit fees and compare the differences of impacts of audit fees of the international "big four"on real earnings management and that of "non-big four". The empirical result indicates that the real earnings management of listed companies has a significantly positive impact on audit fees on the condition that other factor are under control. The impact in "big four"is greater and more significant than that in"non-big four",and"big four"is more responsive to real earnings management. This result enriches the theory of impact of real earnings management on audit fees.
出处 《税务与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期65-73,共9页 Taxation and Economy
关键词 真实盈余管理 审计费用 审计质量 会计师事务 real earnings management audit fee audit quality accounting affairs
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献58

  • 1Goel, A and A Thakor. 2003. Why do firms smooth earnings?. The Journal of Business (Jan.).
  • 2Healy, P and J Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons ( Dec. ).
  • 3Jiambalvo, J 1996. Discussion of "Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC". Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring).
  • 4Magrath, L and L Weld. 2002. Abusive earnings management and early warning signs. The CPA Journal (Aug.).
  • 5Brown, P 1999. Earnings management: A subtle (and troublesome) twist to earnings quality. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis (Winter).
  • 6Dechow, P and D Skinner. 2000. Earnings management : reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Working paper, University of Michigan Business School.
  • 7Marin, D , G Aldhizer III. , J Campbell and T Baker. 2002. When earnings management becomes fraud. Internal Auditing (Jul. /Aug. ).
  • 8Roychowdhury, S 2003. Management of earnings through the manipulation of real activities that affect cash flow from operations. Working paper, University of Rochester.
  • 9Schipper, K 1989. Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons ( Dec. ).
  • 10Watts, R L and J L Zimmerman. 1990. Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review 65.

共引文献687

同被引文献128

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部