期刊文献+

实践的紧迫性 被引量:11

The Urgency of Practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 紧迫性是实践的本质属性之一,实践紧迫性在思想史上却遭到长期遮蔽。布迪厄虽然曾多次提到这一议题,但从未有过专题论述。本文对实践紧迫性做了现象学社会学深描,澄清了它的三重必不可少的意蕴。通过考察人们对以独具时代特征的样式现身的实践紧迫性的体验,阐明了其所包含的三层意涵,同时揭示它对被诸事缠身的现代人的社会性情与心灵习性造成的影响。从实践紧迫性的意蕴,尤其是现代性情境下的实践紧迫性体验及其后果出发,本文重构了"实践紧迫性"这个具有生产性的概念,从而揭示了实践紧迫性及其体验之于理解与解释社会的可能性,至于实践紧迫性概念的其他理论意义则有待未来的探索。 Urgency is one of the essential properties of practice, but the urgency of practice has long been forgotten in the history of social thought. AlthoughPierre Bourdieu repeatedly mentioned the urgency of practice in different texts, he never provided any thematic discourse on it. In this paper, we begin with a phenomenological-sociological description of the urgency of practice from its original site, arising cause, and presence mode. We reveal the tripleconnotations that the urgency of practicecontains: the urgency of time, the urgency of necessity, and highest urgency as a non-urgent state. Secondly, by examining the experience of the urgency of practice in the context of modernity, we not only expound the triple implications of the practical urgency experience, which are.- eventual experience, temporal experience and emotional experience~ but also explore the possible effect on modern people's social disposition and mind habits. From the connotations of the urgency of practice, especially the implications of the practical urgency experience, this paper re-discovers and re-constructs the concept of the urgency of practice on the one hand, and reveals the theoretical possibilities of the concept in understanding and interpreting social life on the other hand. As to the other theoretical meanings that the concept of the urgency of practice may contain, we need to explore this more in the future.
作者 罗朝明 LUO Chaoming(LUO Chaoming, Department of Sociology, Nanjing University of Science & Technolog)
出处 《社会》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期188-216,共29页 Chinese Journal of Sociology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.30916013118)资助~~
关键词 实践 实践的紧迫性 实践紧迫性体验 practice, the urgency of practice, the experience of practical urgency
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1宫留记.场域、惯习和资本:布迪厄与马克思在实践观上的不同视域[J].河南大学学报(社会科学版),2007,47(3):76-80. 被引量:39
  • 2布尔迪厄.《实践感》,南京,译林出版社,2003.
  • 3Scheler. Ressentiment. Milwaukee, Wisconsin : Marquette University Press. Max 1994.
  • 4倪梁康.译后记[A].舍勒.伦理学中的形式主义与质料的价值伦理学[M].倪粱康译.北京:三联书店,2004.
  • 5Bourdieu, Pierre & L. Wacquant 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6霍内特.为承认而斗争[M].胡继华译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 7雷恩.管理思想的演变[M].孔令济译.北京:社会科学出版社,2000.
  • 8吴思.潜规则[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,2001.
  • 9汤森,沃马克.中国政治[M].顾速,董方译.南京:江苏人民出版社,1994.
  • 10Pye. The Spirit of Chinese Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Lucian 1992.

共引文献65

引证文献11

二级引证文献135

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部