侦查诉讼化模式再解读及其制度逻辑

Reinterpretation on Investigative Litigation Mode and Its Institutional Logic

我国审问型侦查模式具有重大缺陷,尤其在以审判为中心的改革背景下其弊端愈加突出,该模式不仅难以保证侦查权的规范行使,也无法满足侦查监督与保障人权的要求。司法权介入侦查、辩护权制约侦查权的精神是侦查诉讼化,构成当前刑事诉讼制度改革的一项重大创新。侦查诉讼化模式中的权力顶点是裁判权,而非侦查权或检察权。侦控面向的司法改革以及认罪认罚从宽的制度实施与侦查诉讼化存在必然联系。对此,我国应该在借鉴域外成熟经验的基础上,从建立司法审查制度、扩大犯罪嫌疑人的程序性权利、完善协作制约型检警关系等方面对现行侦查模式进行适度的诉讼化改造。

There are many defects in the interrogative investigation mode. In the background of the reform to＂ proceedings centered on trial＂, this investigation mode reveals more disadvanta- ges, that is , it cannot regulate the power of investigation and meet the needs of supervision in- vestigation and human rights. The essence of judicial power intervening investigations and the right of defense constraining investigative power is investigative litigation, which is an important innovation in the undergoing procedural and judicial system reform. The vertex power of investi- gative litigation mode is jurisdiction , not the investigation power or procuratorial power. There is connection between the judicial reform catering to investigation and prosecution and the practice of the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment. In order to im- prove the investigation mode , we should set up the system of judicial review based on overseas experience, expand the litigation of the criminal suspects, perfect collaboration＆restriction relation of the police and procurator.