期刊文献+

单体建筑及建筑群表面风压计算的湍流模型研究 被引量:5

Turbulence Model for Calculating Wind Pressure of Single Building and Building Complexes
原文传递
导出
摘要 湍流模型是建筑表面风压数值计算精度的重要影响因素之一。本文针对低层单体建筑和并列式建筑群,在0°~90°多个风向角下,基于雷诺平均法的RNG k-ε、Realizable k-ε和SST k-ω3种湍流模型,对建筑表面风压开展数值计算,并与日本东京工艺大学的风洞实验结果对比,检验不同模型的计算精度。结果表明,Realizable k-ε模型和SST k-ω模型对建筑迎背风面的平均风压及风压差系数和测点风压系数计算精度较高,可用于单体建筑及建筑群的表面风压数值计算。 Turbulence model is one of the most important factors that affect the accuracy of numerical calculation of wind pressure of building. With respect to low-rise single building and parallel-layout building complexes, three turbulence models based on RANS, including RNG k-ε model, Realizable k-ε model and SST k-ω model, were used to calculate the wind pressure under several wind angles ranging from 0 degree to 90 degree. By comparing the results of numerical calculation and wind tunnel tests performed at Tokyo Polytechnic University in Japan, the accuracy of numerical calculation of different models was evaluated. Based on the average wind pressure coefficient on the leeward and windward surface, the coefficient of their wind pressure difference and the coefficient of wind pressure at measuring points, the findings indicate that the numerical results calculated with Realizable k-ε model and SST k-ω model are in better agreement with the results obtained from wind tunnel test than RNG k-ε model. They are acceptable in engineering application of numerical calculation of wind pressure in single building and building complexes.
出处 《建筑科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第6期96-107,共12页 Building Science
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助
关键词 建筑表面风压 计算精度 雷诺平均法 湍流模型 风向角 wind pressure of building, accuracy of numerical calculation, Reynolds average Navier-Stockes (RANS) , Turbulence model, Wind angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1黄本才,郑本辉,芮明卓,王国俭.上海久事大厦风流场和风压分布数值模拟[J].建筑结构,2005,35(1):62-64. 被引量:6
  • 2汪丛军,黄本才,徐晓明,林高.体育场环状悬挑屋盖脉动风压数值模拟[J].力学季刊,2005,26(4):700-707. 被引量:4
  • 3Hoxey,R.P.Richards,P.J.and Short,J.L.(2002).A 6 m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow:Part 1.Full scale and wind tunnel results[J].Wind and Structures,5(2~4),165~176.
  • 4Minson,A.J.,Wood C.J.and Belcher,R.E.(1995).Experimental velocity measurements for CFD validation[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,58,205~215.
  • 5Easom,G.(2000).Improve turbulence models for computational wind engineering[R].PhD thesis,School of Civil Eng.,The University of Nottingham,UK.
  • 6Wright,N.G.and Easom G.J.(2001).Development and validation of a non-linear κ-ε model for flow over a full-scale building[J].Wind and Structures,4(3),177 ~ 196.
  • 7Richards,P.J.,Quinn A.D.and ParkerS.(2002).A6m cube in an atmospheric boundary layer flow Part 2.Computational solutions[J].Wind and Structures,5(2~4),177~192.
  • 8Durbin,P.A.(1995),Separated Flow Computations with the κε-v2 Model[J].AIAA Journal2 33(4),659~664.
  • 9Hai Jin Wei Yang,Xinyang Jin and Dailin Cheng,Numerical Investigation on the Simulation of Flow Field around a Cube[A].Proceeding of The Sixth Asia-Pacific Conference on Wind Engineering[C](APCWE Ⅵ),12 ~ 14 September 2005,Seoul,Korea.
  • 10Levitan M L,Mehta K C,Vann W P,et al.Field measurements of pressure on the Texas Tech Building[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1991(38):227.

共引文献102

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部