2Coast J. Reprocessing data to form QALYs[J]. British Medical Journal, 1992,305(6845):87-90.
3Brazier J E, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A. A review of studies map- ping(or cross walking) from non-preference based measures of health to generic pretorence-based measures[J]. Eur J Health Econ, 2010,11(2):215-25.
4Marra C A,Woolcon J C, Kopec J A, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures(the HUI2,HUI3,SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instnmlen/s(lhe RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Social Science and Medicine, 2005,60(7): 1571 - 1582.
5Tsuchiya A, Brazier J, MeColl E, el al. Deriving prefer- ence-based single indices from non-preterence based condi- tion specific instruments: Converting AQI,Q into EQ-51) indi- ces[El. Munich: University Library of Munich, 2002.
6Juniper E F, Buist A S, Cox F M, et al. Validation of a stan- dardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [J]. Chest, 1999,115(5):1265-1270.
7Whitehurst D G T, Bryan S. Another study showing that two prefrence-based measures of health-related quality of life (EQ-5D and SF-6D) are not interchangeable. But why should we expect them to be?[J]. Value in Heahh, 2011,14(4): 531 - 538.
8Pullenayegum E M, Tarride J E, Xie F, et al. Analysis of heahh utility data when some subjects attain the upper bound of 1 are Tobit and CLAD models apprnpriate[J]. Val- ue Heahh, 2010,13(4):487-494.
9Austin P C, Escobar M, Kopec J A. The use of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of heahh status[J]. Qual Life Res. 2000.9(8):901-910.
10Mortimer D, Segal L. Comparing the incomparable? A sys- tematic review of competing teehniques for converting de- scriptive measures of health states into QALY-weights[J]. Med Decis Making, 2008,28(1): 66-88.
