“隐匿”在法律适用中的相继进路

The Succession Approaches 'Hidden' in the Application of Law

行政争议的有效解决取决于法律适用的说服力和决断力,其中前者取决于对何为法律规则共识的探求,后者则有赖于在规则缺失时何者能作出更好的判断。在"杭州啄木鸟鞋业案"中,法院通过认识因素得出了司法解释并修正了行政解释,但仅凭法律解释无法得出商品是否构成类似的判断,"隐匿"其中的意志因素被凸显出来。不确定法律概念的具体化分为规范性和功能性前后两条进路。在前者,法律适用者运用法律解释的方法不断地认识既存的法律规则,而在后者,法律适用者演变为立法者,并按照宪法的逻辑行使最后判断权。最后,这两条进路作为法律适用的范式之一能够将法律的说服力和决断力展现出来,进而更加有效地解决行政争议。

The effective solution to administrative disputes is based on persuasiveness and determination of law, the first of which depends on the exploration to the consensus of law, and the second lies upon who can make better decisions when rules are insufficient. In the Hangzhou Woodpecker Shoes case, the court reached the judicial interpretation with cognitive factor, and then revised the administrative one. However, only the method of law interpretation can not get the conclusion that goods are similar after examining the laws, so the ＇hidden＇ will factor is appeared. With the further theory refining , the specification of the uncertain law concepts can be divided into Normative approach and Functional one. For the former, the law applicant uses the law interpretation method to find the existing laws; while for the latter, he becomes the law maker and implements the final say power under the Constitution logic. At last, these two approaches, as the paradigm of law application, can exhibit the persuasiveness and determination of law, and then resolve the administrative dispute effectively.