顾颉刚在厦门大学的《尚书》讲义——兼论顾颉刚“王肃伪造说”的学术史背景和意义

Gu Jiegang's Lecture Notes on the SHANGSHU at Xiamen University:A Study of the Academic Context and Meaning of His Argument on “Wang Su Forged the GUWENSHANGSHU”

顾颉刚1926年任厦门大学史学研究教授,承担"经学专书研究"课程。这是他首次承担的课程,而且是他之后连续撰写的《尚书》讲义的开端。本文除了利用《顾颉刚全集》所收的有关厦门大学讲义的史料以外,还利用顾颉刚的原稿和在大学发布的油印本,试图全面梳理此次厦门大学讲义的内容。顾颉刚此次的讲义,基本上只讲到《伪古文尚书》的造伪和辨伪,他主要根据丁晏的说法指出《伪古文尚书》是王肃伪造的。这"王肃伪造说",顾颉刚开课时已有强烈反驳,现在看来已不成立。本文最后讨论顾颉刚的"王肃伪造说"的背景和意义,以期作为对学术思想史研究的一种方法上的反思。

Gu Jiegang became a professor of history at Xiamen University in 1926 where he taught a course on the ＂Study of Confucian Classical Books＂. It was his first course at the university, and it＇s also the beginning of his continuous writing of lecture notes on SHANGSHU. This article not only uses historical materials embodied in the GUJIEGANGWENJI（ Complete Works of Gu Jiegang） , but also uses Gu Jiegang＇s original manuscripts and mimeographed handouts, in an attempt to grasp the context of the course at Xiamen University comprehensively. In this course, he only mentioned the forgery and distinguishing forgery of the GUWENSHANGSHU （ Old Text of the Book of Documents） , mainly, according to Ding Yan＇s statement, he pointed out that Wang Su forged it. In fact, when he undertook teaching the course, this argument was strongly argued by some scholars and it seems the argument on ＂Wang Su Forged the GUWENSHANGSHU＂ is not correct. This article finally discusses the contexts and meanings of Gu Jiegang＇s argument on ＂Wang Su Forged the GUWENSHANGSHU＂, with a methodological reflection on the study of the history of academic thoughts.