期刊文献+

无神经症状胸腰椎爆裂骨折中椎间盘损伤与骨折严重程度的相关性 被引量:5

Correlation between disc injury and parameters of vertebral body damage in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar bust fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察无神经症状胸腰椎爆裂骨折中椎间盘损伤与伤椎椎体骨折严重程度的相关性,并为进一步行MRI检查提供一定理论依据。方法采用回顾性病例系列研究分析2015年1月-2015年12月收治的22例(44个椎间盘)无神经症状胸腰椎骨折(T11~L2)患者临床资料。其中男12例,女10例;年龄43~60岁,平均47.9岁。基于MRI对伤椎上下椎间盘进行损伤分级:0级18个,1级11个,2级12个,3级3个。将0级或1级的患者归为椎间盘完整组(10例),其余为椎间盘损伤组(12例)。基于CT重建图像判断骨折严重程度,测量伤椎楔变角、局部后凸角、伤椎及邻近上下椎体前后缘高度比、椎管侵占率。采用Spearman相关系数评估骨折严重程度与椎间盘损伤分级的相关性,比较两组骨折严重程度的差异性,绘制受试者T作特征(ROC)曲线评估骨折严重程度指标判断椎间盘损伤的诊断价值。结果伤椎楔变角(P〈0.05)、伤椎前后缘高度比(P〈0.01)与伤椎上位椎间盘损伤严重程度相关。两组椎管侵占率、伤椎楔变角、伤椎前后缘高度比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05或0.01)。ROC曲线结果显示,椎管侵占率、伤椎楔变角、伤椎前后缘高度比的曲线下面积分别为0.758,0.762,0.867,三者间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。最佳阈值分别为椎管侵占21%,伤椎前后缘高度比0.69,伤椎楔变角15.4。结论伤椎楔变角、伤椎前后缘高度比与伤椎上位椎间盘损伤密切相关。椎管侵占率〉21%或伤椎楔变角〉15。或伤椎前后缘高度比〉0.69可作为无神经症状胸腰椎爆裂骨折进一步行MRI检查评估椎间盘损伤的指标。 Objective To assess the disc injury in neurologically intact thoracolumbar bust fractures and to evaluate the correlation between the severity of disc injury and the parameters of vertebral body damage as as to formulate radiologic index for further MRI examination. Methods A retrospective case series review was made on 22 patients (44 discs ) with thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit treated from January 2015 to December 2015. Vertebral level involved was from T11-L2. There were 12 males and 10 females, with the mean age of 47.9 years (range, 43-60 years). MRI were used to evaluate the severity of disc injury. Among the 44 discs, 18 were Grade 0, 11 were Grade 1, 12 were Grade 2, and three were Grade 3. Then patients with Grade 0 and 1 were taken as disc intact group and other 12 patients disc rupture group. Vertebral wedge angle, local kyphosis angle, anterior and posterior vertebral body height and canal compromise were measured on CT to determine the damage of fracture. Spearman correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the severity of disc injury and the parameters of vertebral body damage, and receiver operative curve ( ROC ) was used to assess the effectiveness of these indexes in predicting disc injury. Results Vertebral wedge angle and anterior/posterior vertebral body height ratio were correlated with the severity of superadjacent disc injury ( P 〈 0.05 or 0.01 ). Canal compromise, vertebral wedge angle and anterior/posterior vertebral body height ratio were significantly different between the two groups (P 〈 0.05 or 0.01 ). ROC results showed the area under curve of canal compromise, vertebral wedge angle and anterior/posterior vertebral body height ratio were 0. 758, 0. 762, and 0. 867 respectively, indicating no significant difference (P 〉 0.05). Threshold of canal compromise, vertebral wedge angle and anterior/posterior vertebral body height ratio were 21%, 15.4°, and 0.69 respectively. Conclusions Vertebral wedge angle and anterior/posterior vertebral body hight ratio are correlated with the severity of superadjaceut disc injury. Canal compromise 〉21% , VWA 〉 15~and anterior/posterior vertebral body height ratio 〉 0.69 may be the practice preferences of indications for ordering a MRI in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar bust fractures.
作者 米杰 张凯 孙晓江 赵杰 Mi Jie Zhang Kai Sun Xiaojiang Zhao Jie.(Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Nineth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China)
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第7期621-626,共6页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词 胸椎 腰椎 椎间盘 磁共振成像 无神经症状 Thoracic vertebrae Lumbar vertebrae Intervertebral disc Magnetic resonance imaging Neurologically intact
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献32

  • 1王自立,陈军,乔永东.胸腰段脊柱骨折后路术后迟发后凸畸形的研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(12):1143-1146. 被引量:17
  • 2Magerl F,Aebi M,Gertzbein SD,et al. A comprehensive clas- sification of thoracic and lumbar injuries[J].Eur Spine J,1994, 3(4) : 184-201.
  • 3Oner FC, van der Rijt RR. Changes in the disc space after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine [J].J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1998,80(5 ) : 833-839.
  • 4Lin RM;Panjabi MM,Oxland TR. Functional radiographs of a- cute thoracolumbar burst fractures:a biomechanical study[J]. Spine, 1993,18(16) :2431-2437.
  • 5Mtiller U,Berlemann U,Sledge J, et al. Treatment of thora- columbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation :bisegmenta| stabiliza- tion with monoseg- mental fusion [J].Eur Spine J,1999,8(4): 284-289.
  • 6Wood K,Buttermann G,Mehbod A, et al. Operative comparedwith nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit:a prospective,randomized study[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003,85 (5) : 773-781.
  • 7Siebenga J,Lefefink VJ,Segers MJ,et al.Treatment of traumat- ic thoracolumbar spine fraetures:a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment[J]. Spine,2006,31(25):2881-2890.
  • 8Dai LY,Jiang LS,Jiang SD. Posterior short-segment fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures:a five to seven-year prospective randomized study [J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2009,91 (5) : 1033-1041.
  • 9Wang ST,Ma HL,Liu CL,et al. Is fusion necessary for surgi- cally treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine?:a prospective, randomized study[.l].Spine,2006,31 (23), 2646-2652.
  • 10Oner FC,vd Rijt RH,Ramos LM,et al.Correlation of MR im- ages of disc injuries with anatomic sections in experimental thoracolumbar spine fractures [J].Eur Spine J,1999,8 (3):194-198.

共引文献211

同被引文献90

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部