期刊文献+

论知识产权诉讼中问卷调查证据的确立 被引量:1

Research On the Establishment of Questionnaire Survey evidence in Intellectual Property Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 问卷调查证据是运用社会科学方法将相关公众不确定的心理状态以数据形式客观展现,其在证明目标群体的主观意识倾向方面具有显著优势。问卷调查证据已成为我国司法实践,特别是知识产权诉讼中不可或缺的证据形式,常被用于知识产权案件的实体审理之中。然该证据在司法实践中的运用状况却千差万别,结果迥异。为此,我国证据立法亟需明确界定问卷调查证据,并尽快制定此类证据统一的司法审查标准,在确保对问卷调查证据实现精准把握的前提下,适当扩大该证据的适用范围,确保我国知识产权诉讼中问卷调查证据的效力得以充分实现。 The questionnaire survey evidence is to use the social science method to show the uncertain psychological states of relevant public in the form of data,which has significant advantages in proving the subjective consciousness tendency of the target group. The evidence of the questionnaire has become an indispensable form of evidence in China's judicial practice,especially in intellectual property litigation,which is often applied to intellectual property cases. However,the judicial practice is very different,the results are different. Therefore,China's evidence legislation need to define the questionnaire survey evidence clearly and distinctly and to set such evidence unified judicial review standards as soon as possible,to ensure that the questionnaire survey evidence can be utilized accurately,and to expand the applications of the evidence as appropriate,thus we can guarantee the validity of questionnaire survey evidence in China's intellectual property litigation be fully realized.
作者 周琨
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期89-93,共5页 Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词 知识产权诉讼 问卷调查 证据制度 intellectual property litigation questionnaire survey evidence system
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Jack P.Lipton."Trademark Litigation:A New Look at the Use of Social Science"[].Arizona LawReview.1987
  • 2F.3d410C.A.7 . 1994
  • 3.United States v.88Cases,More or Less,Etc[].Fd(CA).
  • 4Artemio Rivera."Testing the Admissibility of Trademark Surveys after Daubert"[].Journal ofPatent andTrademark Office Society.2002
  • 5Lawrence E.Evans,Jr,David M.Gunn.Trademark Surveys[].The Trademark Reporter.1989
  • 6EdmundM.Morgan."Hearsay Dangers and the Application of the Hearsay Concept"[].Harvard Law Review (-).(19481949)
  • 7Richard J.Leighton."Using(and Not Using)the Hearsay Rules to Admit and Exclude Surveys in Lanham Act False Advertising andTrademark Cases"[].The Trademark Reporter.2002
  • 8Reginald E.Caughey."The Use of Public Polls,Surveys and Sampling as Evidence in Litigation,and Particularly Trademark and UnfairCompetition Cases"[].California LawReview.1956
  • 9.Aloe Creme Laboratories,Inc.v.Milsan,Inc[].Fd.1970
  • 10Albert Robin,Howard B.Barnaby."Trademark Surveys—HeadsYou Lose,Tails They Win"[].Trademark Reporte.1983

共引文献37

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部